Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:00:45.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beef Grading and Imperfect Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

V. James Rhodes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In September 1974, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it planned to make major changes in its grading of beef. The changes would redefine criteria for eating quality, particularly requiring less marbling for each grade.

The announcement was strategically timely: consumers had been restive over what they regarded as high prices for beef, while the poor 1974 corn crop made it economical to produce less fat in the beef carcass. Moreover, meat, packers and many cattle feeders had been demanding a grade revision which would permit shorter feeding, less waste fat and lower prodduction costs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1975 , pp. 149 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Alsmeyer, R.H., et.al. “The Relative Significance of Factors Influencing and/or Associated with Beef Tenderness,” Proceedings, 11th Research Conference, American Meat Institute Foundation.Google Scholar
[2] Butler, O.D. “Type and Quality in Live Animal and in the Carcass”, Paper given at National Beef Industry Conference, Purdue, 1959.Google Scholar
[3] Calf News, Monthly trade journal published in Tarzana, California, September, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Calf News, January 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Calf News, August 1974.Google Scholar
[6] Cramer, Charles L. et.al. An Analysis of Retail Yield of Beef Carcasses, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 858, April 1964.Google Scholar
[7] Juillerat, M.E., et.al. Consumer Preference for Beef as Associated with Selected Characteristics of the Meat, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Research Division Bulletin 72, 1972.Google Scholar
[8] Parrish, F.C. Jr. “Relationship of Marbling to Meat Tenderness,” Iowa State Journal Paper No. J-7869, Proceedings of the Meat Industry Research Conference, 1974.Google Scholar
[9] Peterson, Robert. “The Price-Perceived Quality Relationship: Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, Nov. 1970, pp. 525-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Pierce, John C. “Federal Beef Grade Standards,” Statement before the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock and Grains, July 25, 1974.Google Scholar
[11] Pierce, J.C., et.al. “Some Factors Influencing Yields of Wholesale and Retail Cuts from Beef Carcasses,” Paper given at American Society of Animal Production, 1956.Google Scholar
[12] Purcell, Wayne D. “Pressures for Change in the Beef Grades,” Calf News, August 1973.Google Scholar
[13] Rhodes, V. James. “How the Marking of Beef Grades Was Obtained,” Journal of Farm Economics, Feb. 1960, pp. 133-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Rhodes, V. James. “Acceptance and Yield of Choice and Good Beef: Research Results and Implications,” Journal of Farm Economics, May 1961, pp. 181–196.Google Scholar
[15] Rhodes, V. James, et.al. Variations in Consumer Acceptability of Loins from Market Lots of Cattle, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin No. 848, Feb. 1964.Google Scholar
[16] Scitovsky, Tibor. Welfare and Competition, Rev. Ed., Homewood, Illinois: R.D. Irwin, 1971, Ch. 23.Google Scholar
[17] Supermarket News. “ Kroger Launching Low-End Beef Plan”, September 23, 1974.Google Scholar
[19] USDA-AMS. Notice of Proposal to Change Standards for Beef Grades (7 CFR Part 53), September 10, 1974.Google Scholar
[20] USDA- AMS. Official United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef. Google Scholar