Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:44:46.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of the Price Impact of the South Carolina Cucumber Marketing Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Gary J. Wells  and
Jerold F. Pittman
Gary J. Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Clemson University
Jerold F. Pittman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Clemson University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1970 a marketing order, made possible by a 1968 state enabling act, was formed for South Carolina fresh market cucumbers. This legislation is similar to current federal legislation, but South Carolina has no federal marketing order for cucumbers. Order provisions that affect price formation are the subject of this article. Price posting and adoption of statewide USDA inspection requirements are the order provisions that yield the largest and most direct price impact (S.C. Cucumber Board.) The apparent goal of these provisions is higher and more stable prices.

The objective of our research is to investigate the success of the South Carolina marketing order in achieving its goal of higher and more stable fresh market cucumber prices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1980 , pp. 15 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.. Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
Houck, J. P. “A Look at Flexibilities and Elasticities.” J. Farm Econ. 48(1966):225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J.Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972.Google Scholar
Sanders, Donald H., Murph, A. F., and Eng, R. J.. Statistics: A Fresh Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1980.Google Scholar
South Carolina Crop and Livestock Reporting Service. “South Carolina Agricultural Prices and Revised Indexes, 1960–1971.” AE 357, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University, 1972.Google Scholar
South Carolina ”South Carolina Cash Receipts from Farm Marketings.” AE 409, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University, 1979.Google Scholar
South Carolina Cucumber Board. “Marketing Order No. 3 for South Carolina Fresh Market Cucumbers.” Burton, South Carolina, 1975.Google Scholar
Snedecor, George W. and Cochran, William G.. Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Vegetables: Fresh Market.” Various issues. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. “Survey of Current Business.” Various issues. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar