Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:28:28.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Consumer Preferences for Country-of-Origin Labeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2005

Maria L. Loureiro  and
Wendy J. Umberger
Maria L. Loureiro
Affiliation:
IDEGA-Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Wendy J. Umberger
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we assess consumer willingness to pay for a mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) program applied to beef ribeye steaks, chicken breasts, and pork chops, all labeled as “Certified U.S.” products. A consumer survey was mailed in spring and early summer 2003 to households in the continental United States. Results indicate that consumers are in general very concerned about food safety issues, viewing U.S. meat as the safest among the selection of countries considered. Nevertheless, consumer willingness to pay for Certified U.S. products is relatively small, although above the expected implementation costs associated with a mandatory labeling program. This finding coincides with the fact that only 36% of the sample favored consumers paying directly for the costs related to a mandatory COOL program.

Keywords

beefconsumer preferencescountry-of-origin labelingdichotomous choicewillingness to payD12Q13
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , April 2005 , pp. 49 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R.S., and Kay, S.. COOL Cost Assessment. Sparks/CBW COOL Consortium, April 2003. Internet site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/cool/comments/cooll041.pdf (Accessed May 14, 2003).Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Solow, J., Portney, P., Learner, E., Radner, R., and Schuman, E.H.. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58,10(1993):4601–14.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. Country-of-Origin Labeling for Foods: Current Law and Proposed Changes. Washington, DC: The Committee for the National Institute for the Environment, October 21, 1999.Google Scholar
Brester, G.W., and Marsh, J.. Distributional Impacts of Country-of-Origin Labeling in the U.S. Meat Industry. Working paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University, 2004.Google Scholar
Cummings, R.G., Harrison, G.W., and Rutström, E.E.. “Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?” American Economic Review 85,1(1995):260–66.Google Scholar
Cummings, R.G., Elliott, S., Harrison, G.W., and Murphy, J.. “Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?” Journal of Political Economy 105,3(1997):609–21.10.1086/262084Google Scholar
Davis, E.E. Estimate of Start-up Costs for Country of Origin Labeling Requirements to the Texas Beef Cattle and Beef Sectors. Texas A&M University Extension Fact Sheet, July 2003. Internet site: http://livestock-marketing.tamu.edu/publications/Start%20Up%20COOL.html (Accessed December 30, 2003).Google Scholar
Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley Company, December 1999.Google Scholar
Haab, T.C., Huang, J.C., and Whitehead, J.C.. “Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A Comment.” Journal of Political Economy 107,1(1999):186–97.10.1086/250056Google Scholar
Haab, T.C., and McConnell, E.. “Referendum Models and Economic Values: Theoretical, Intuitive, and Practical Bounds on Willingness to Pay.” Land Economics 74,2(1998):216–29.10.2307/3147052Google Scholar
Hallman, W.K., Schilling, B.J., and Turvey, C.G.. Public Perceptions and Responses to Mad Cow Disease: A National Survey of Americans. Fact Sheet, Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University, January 2004. Internet site: http://www.foodpolicyinstitute.org/docs/summary/madcowsum.pdf (Accessed February 14, 2004).Google Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989):1057–61.10.2307/1242685Google Scholar
Hayes, D.J., and Meyer, S.R.. “Impact of Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling on U.S. Pork Exports.” White Paper. Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Spring 2003.Google Scholar
Krissoff, B., Kuchler, F., Nelson, K., Perry, J., and Somwaru, A.. “Country of Origin Labeling: Theory and Observation.” Electronic Outlook Report from the Economic Research Service. Washington, DC: USDA, January 2004.Google Scholar
List, J.A., and Gallet, C.A.. “What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?” Environmental and Resource Economics 20(2001):241–54.10.1023/A:1012791822804Google Scholar
Loomis, J. “An Investigation into the Reliability of Intended Visitation Behavior.” Environmental and Resource Economics 3,2(1993):183–91.10.1007/BF00338784Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and McCluskey, J.J.. “Assessing Consumer Response to Protected Geographical Identification Labeling.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 16,3(2000):309–20.10.1002/1520-6297(200022)16:3<309::AID-AGR4>3.0.CO;2-G3.0.CO;2-G>Google Scholar
Loureiro, M.L., and Umberger, W.J.. “Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(August 2003):287–301.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L. “Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-To-Pay For Golden Rice.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85,4(November 2003):840–56.10.1111/1467-8276.00492Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., and Anderson, J.D.. “Effects of Country of Origin Labeling on Meat Producers and Consumers.” Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Staff Paper #03-07, June 2003.Google Scholar
Plain, R., and Grimes, G.. “Benefits of COOL to the Cattle Industry.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri, AEWP 2003-2, 2003. Internet site: http://agebb.missouri.edu/mkt/cool.htm (Accessed May 28, 2004).Google Scholar
Quagrainie, K., Unterschultz, J., and Veeman, M.. “Effects of Product Origin and Selected Demographics on Consumer Choice of Red Meats.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(1998):201–19.10.1111/j.1744-7976.1998.tb00363.x10.1111/j.1744-7976.1998.tb00363.xGoogle Scholar
Roosen, J., Lusk, J.L., and Fox, J.A.. “Consumer Demand for and Attitudes Toward Alternative Beef Labeling Strategies in France, Germany, and the UK.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 19,1(2003):77–90.10.1002/agr.10041Google Scholar
Schupp, A., and Gillespie, J.. “Handler Reactions to Potential Compulsory Country-of-Origin Labeling of Fresh or Frozen Beef.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(April 2001a):161–71.Google Scholar
Schupp, A., and Gillespie, J.. “Consumer Attitudes Toward Potential Country-of-Origin Labeling of Fresh or Frozen Beef.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 33(November 2001b):34–44.Google Scholar
Sherrick, B.J., Barry, P.J., Schnitkey, G.D., Ellinger, P.N., and Wansink, B.. “Farmers' Preferences for Crop Insurance Attributes.” Review of Agricultural Economics 25,2(2003):415–29.10.1111/1467-9353.00147Google Scholar
Sitz, B.M., Calkins, C.R., Umberger, W.J., and Feuz, D.M.. “Consumer Acceptance and Value of Beef from Various Countries of Origin.” 2004 Nebraska Beef Report, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, MP 80-A, 2004.Google Scholar
Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R., and Killinger, K.. “U.S. Consumer Preference and Willingness-to-Pay for Domestic Corn-Fed versus International Grass-Fed Beef Measured through an Experimental Auction.” Agribusiness: An International Journal 18,4(Autumn 2002):491–504.Google Scholar
Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R., and Sitz, B.M.. “Country-of-Origin Labeling of Beef Products: Consumers U.S. Perceptions.” Journal of Food Distribution Research 34(3)(November 2003): 103–16.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. “United States Census, 2000.” Internet site: http://www.census.gov (Accessed December 14, 2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS). 2002 Farm Bill Provisions, Subtitle D–Country of Origin Labeling, May 2002. Internet site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/cool/subtitled.htm (Accessed May 28, 2003).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS). “Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Lamb, Pork, Fish, Perishable Agricultural Commodities and Peanuts,” Volume 68, No. 210, October 2003. Federal Register Internet site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/cool/ls0304.pdf (Accessed October 31, 2003).AMBIGUOUS (87 citations)Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (USDA/AMS). “Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Fish and Shellfish,” Volume 69, No. 192, October 5, 2004. Federal Register Internet site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/cool/COOLfr.pdf (Accessed November 4, 2004).AMBIGUOUS (72 citations)Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA/ERS). Data: Retail Scanner Prices for Meat. Internet site: http://ers.usda.gov/data/MeatScanner/ (Accessed April 30, 2003).Google Scholar
VanSickle, J.R., McEowen, R., Taylor, C.R., Harl, N., and Connor, J.. “Country of Origin Labeling: A Legal and Economic Analysis.” University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center Paper, PBTC 03-5, May 2003.Google Scholar