Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:08:36.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Application of Linear Goal Programming to Forest Harvest Scheduling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James E. Hotvedt*
Affiliation:
School of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Louisiana State University

Extract

Forest management and planning is complex, involving the application of many scarce and diverse resources to the production and maintenance of a multitude of products and services from the forest over a relatively long period of time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K. J.Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis.Amer. Econ. Rev. 64(1974):110.Google Scholar
Broderick, S. H.Determining Economically Optimal Management Regimes for Loblolly Pine in Eastern Virginia.” Master's thesis, VPI&SU, 1978.Google Scholar
Charles, A., and Cooper, W. W.. Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1961.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G.. “Organizational Goals.” In Readings in Organizational Theory: A Behavioral Approach, Hill, W. A..and Egan, D. M., eds. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1966.Google Scholar
Davis, K. P.Forest Management. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
Dress, P. E.Forest Land Use Planning—An Applications Environment for Goal Programming.Systems Analysis and Forest Resource Management, Meadows, J., Bare, B., Ware, K., and Row, C., eds. Soc. of Amer. Foresters, Bethesda, Md., 1975.Google Scholar
Field, R.C., Dress, P. E., and Fortson, J. C.. “Complementary Linear and Goal Programming Procedures for Timber Harvest Scheduling,” For. Sci. 26(1980):121133.Google Scholar
Henderson, J., and Quandt, R.. Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.Google Scholar
Hotvedt, J. E., Leuschner, W. A., and Buhyoff, G. J.. “A Heuristic Weight Determination Procedure for Goal Programs Used for Harvest Scheduling,” Canadian J. For. Res. 12(1982):292298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignizio, J. P.Goal Programming and Extensions. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1976.Google Scholar
Iriji, Y.Management Goals and Accounting for Control. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.Google Scholar
Kidd, W. E., Thompson, E. F., and Hoepner, P. H.. “Forest Regulation by Linear Programming—A Case Study.J. For. 64(1966):611613.Google Scholar
Lane, M. N.Goal Programming and Satisficing Models in Economic Analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, 1970.Google Scholar
Lee, S. M.Goal Programming for Decision Analysis. Philadelphia: Auerback Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar
Loucks, D. P.The Development of an Optimal Program for Sustained-Yield Management,” J. For. 62(1964):485490.Google Scholar
Navon, D. I.Timber RAM: A Long-Range Planning Method for Commercial Timberlands Under Multiple-Use Management.USDA For. Ser. Res. paper PSW-70, 1971.Google Scholar
Margolis, J.Traditional and Revisionist Theories of the Firm: A Comment.J. Bus. 32(1959):178182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, A., and Meadows, J. C.. “Planning Resource Use on National Forests to Achieve Multiple Objectives.J. Environ. Mgmt. 3(1975):351366.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.Quar. J. Econ. 69(1955):99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiler, T. C.Linear Programming and Optimal Cutting Policies,Paper Industry. 41(1959):384386.Google Scholar
Wallenius, J.Comparative Evaluation of Some Interactive Approaches to Multicriterion Optimization.Mgmt.Sci. 21(1975):13871396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, G. O., and Clutter, J. L.. “A Mathematical Programming System for the Management of Industrial Forests.For. Sci. 17(1971):428445.Google Scholar