Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:01:34.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Factors Affecting Cow Auction Price Differentials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

James Mintert ,
Joanne Blair ,
Ted Schroeder  and
Frank Brazle
James Mintert
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics atKansas State University
Joanne Blair
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics atKansas State University
Ted Schroeder
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics atKansas State University
Frank Brazle
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from Kansas cattle auctions were analyzed to estimate the impact a wide variety of physical characteristics had upon cow prices. Weight, lot size, health, pregnancy, grade, dressing percent, breed, time of sale, and market location were important factors affecting the differences in cow prices across lots on a given day. Results suggest that producers interested in maximizing the price they receive for their cows should market healthy cows in desirable lot sizes at higher dressing percentages.

Keywords

cow pricesphysical characteristics impactauctions
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 23 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belsley, , David, A., Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy E.. Regression Diagnostics. John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccola, , Steven, T. “An Approach to the Analysis of Feeder Cattle Price Differentials”. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccola, , Steven, T. “Price Trends at Livestock Auctions”. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buccola, , Steven, T. and Jessee, David L.. “A U.S. Regional Model of Feeder Steer-Heifer Price Differentials. So. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1979):61–65.Google Scholar
Clary, G.M. Jordan, J.W., and Thompson, C.E.. “Economics of Purchasing Genetically Superior Beef Bulls”. So. J. Agr. Econ. 16(1984):31–36.Google Scholar
Dikeman, , Michael, E. “Evaluation of Beef Breeds for Meat Production”. Beef Cattle Short Course Proceedings, May 6-8,1987, University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Faminow, , Merle, D. and Gum, Russell L.. “Feeder Cattle Price Differentials in Arizona Auction Markets”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1986):156–163.Google Scholar
Innes, , Robert, and Carman, Hoy. “Tax Reform and Beef Cow Replacement Strategy”. West. J. Agru>. Econ. 13(1988):254–266.Google Scholar
Kerr, , William, A. “Selective Breeding, Heritable Characteristics and Genetic-Based Technological Change in the Canadian Beef Cattle Industry”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1984): 14–28.Google Scholar
Kuehn, J.P. “An Analysis of the West Virginia Livestock Auction Pricing Mechanism”. Resource Management Series Number 77, Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, West Virginia Univ., September, 1979.Google Scholar
Ladd, , George, W and Martin, Marvin B.. “Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics”. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976): 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, , John, M. “Monthly Price Premiums and Discounts Between Steer Calves and Yearlings”. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 67(1985):307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzie, , Elmer, L., Gum, Russell L., and Cable, C. Curtis Jr. “Major Determinants of Feeder Cattle Prices at Arizona Livestock Auctions”. Technical Bulletin 197, Agricultural Experiment Station, Univ. of Arizona, September, 1972.Google Scholar
Riley, , Jack, . “Feeding Cull Cows”. Report of Progress 320, Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, March 1978.Google Scholar
Schroeder, , Ted, , Mintert, James, Brazle, Frank, and Grunewald, Orlen. “Factors Affecting Feeder Cattle Price Differentials”. West. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1988):71–81.Google Scholar
Sosnick, S.H. “Bidding Strategy at Ordinary Auctions”. J. Farm Econ 45(1963): 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, , Gregory, M and Linton, Daniel A.. “Economic Evaluation of an Alternative Marketing System for Feeder Cattle in Alabama”. So. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1981):85–89.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices. Washington D.C., 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Washington D.C., 1988.Google Scholar
Yager, , William, A., Greer, R. Clyde and Burt, Oscar R.. “Optimal Policies for Marketing Cull Beef Cows”. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar