Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:31:39.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Changing Methods of Vertical Coordination in the Pork Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Steve W. Martinez ,
Kevin E. Smith  and
Kelly D. Zering
Steve W. Martinez
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Kevin E. Smith
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Kelly D. Zering
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the motivation behind contracts and vertical integration in the pork industry, and simulates the effects of potential improvements in coordination. Incentives related to lowering costs of measuring and sorting hogs, and protecting against opportunistic behavior associated with specific assets, can result in hog quality improvements. A framework for simulating the effects of increased coordination through contracts and vertical integration was developed and used to evaluate potential improvements in leanness. Although simulations suggest only modest changes in pork prices and supplies, gains in consumers' surplus could be substantial for larger demand shifts due to quality improvements.

Keywords

contractshogslean porksimulation modelvertical coordinationvertical integration
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , December 1998 , pp. 301 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azzam, A. “Testing the Monopsony-Inefficiency Incentive for Backward Integration.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 78(1996):585-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzam, A., and Wellman, A.. “Packer Integration into Hog Production: Current Status and Likely Impacts of Increased Vertical Control on Hog Prices and Quantities.” Res. Bull. No. 315-F, IANR Agr. Res. Div., University of Nebraska, 1992.Google Scholar
Barzel, Y. “Measurement Costs and the Organization of Markets.” J. Law and Econ. 25(1982):27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehlje, M. “Vertical Coordination and Structural Change in the Pork Industry: Discussion.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77(1995):1225-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, J.C. “New Techniques for Estimation of Carcass Composition.” In Quality and Grading of Carcasses of Meat Animals, ed., Jones, M.. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Freese, B., Fee, R., and Looker, D.. “New Deals at the Packing Plants.” Successful Farming (March 1995):22–25.Google Scholar
Hayenga, M.L., Lawrence, J.D., Rhodes, V.J., and Grimes, G.A.. “Vertical Coordination in Hog Production.” In Concentration in the Red Meat Packing Industry, chap. 5. USDA/Packers and Stockyards Programs, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, February 1996.Google Scholar
Hennessy, D.A. “Information Asymmetry as a Reason for Food Industry Vertical Integration.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 78(1996):1034–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, C. “Industrialization in the Pork Industry.” Choices (4th Quarter 1994):9–13.Google Scholar
Kilmer, R.L., and Ward, R.W.. “Simulating the Performance of a Multiple Exchange Mechanism Market.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 14(1982):17–21.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H.W., and Nelson, R.G.. “Vertical Control and die Farm-Retail Price Spread for Eggs.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 15(1993):473-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, B., Crawford, R., and Alchian, A.. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process.” J. Law and Econ. 21(1978):297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwoka, J.E. “Vertical Integration and Its Alternatives for Achieving Cost Efficiency in Electric Power.” Economics Discus. Pap. No. D-9601, Dept. of Econ., George Washington University, March 1996.Google Scholar
Lemieux, C.M., and Wohlgenant, M.K.. “Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):903-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, S.W., Smith, K.E., and Zering, K.D.. “Vertical Coordination and Consumer Welfare: The Case of the Pork Industry.” Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 753, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, August 1997.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P., and Roberts, J.. Economics, Organization, and Management. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
Morgan, J.B., Smith, G.C., Cannon, J., McKeith, F., and Heavner, J.. “Pork Distribution Channel Audit Report.” In Pork Chain Quality Audit, eds., Meeker, D. and Sonka, S., pp. 30–76. Progress report prepared for the National Pork Producers Council. National Pork Producers Council in cooperation with the National Pork Board, Des Moines IA, 6 April 1994.Google Scholar
Rhodes, V.J. “The Industrialization of Hog Production.” Rev. Agr. Econ. 17(1995):107-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelanski, H.A., and Klein, P.G.. “Empirical Research in Transaction Cost Economics: A Review and Assessment.” J. Law, Econ., and Organization 11(1995):335-61.Google Scholar
Smithfield Foods, Inc. Annual Report. Smithfield VA, 1994.Google Scholar
Sonka, S., Doehring, T., and Hofing, S.. “An Economic Assessment of Enhancing Quality Management in the Pork Industry.” In Pork Chain Quality Audit, eds., Meeker, D. and Sonka, S., pp. 170–223. Progress report prepared for the National Pork Producers Council. National Pork Producers Council in cooperation with the National Pork Board, Des Moines IA, 6 April 1994.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hog Outlook. USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, 12 October 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock Slaughter. USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington DC. Annual Summaries, 1993-95.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Meat Animals—Production, Disposition, and Income. USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington DC. Annual Summaries, 1993-95.Google Scholar
Unnevehr, L.J. “Consumer Demand for Rice Grain Quality and Returns to Research for Quality Improvements in Southeast Asia.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 68(1986):634-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnevehr, L.J., and Bard, S.. “Will Consumers Pay for Less Fat?” J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 18(1993):288-95.Google Scholar