Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:47:18.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Economic Analysis of a Corn-Soybean Crop Rotation Under Various Input Combinations in South Central Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert D. Funk ,
James W. Mjelde ,
Frank M. Hons  and
Vince A. Saladino
Robert D. Funk
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
James W. Mjelde
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Frank M. Hons
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Vince A. Saladino
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eight input combinations of commercial fertilizer, insecticides, and herbicides on a corn-soybean crop rotation in the Brazos River Bottom of Texas are evaluated. Input combinations which do not fully utilize all three inputs are consistently ranked higher by all criteria as the preferred input strategy for the corn-soybean rotation system. These results, which indicate limited input crop rotations that fall somewhere between the extremes of conventional agricultural production and organic agriculture, deserve further attention as a possible production alternative.

Keywords

cornlimited inputsoybean
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 69 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowling, C.C. “Insect Pests of Soybeans.” in Soybeans on the Texas Coastal Prairie. Research Monograph—11. Texas Agriculture Experiment Station, College Station, TX. 1981.Google Scholar
Buzby, J.C. and Skees, J.R.. “Consumers Want Reduced Exposure to Pesticides on Food.” Food Review 17(1994): 19–22.Google Scholar
Cacek, T. and Langner, L.L.. “The Economic Implications of Organic Farming.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1(1986):25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, M.J. and Raskin, R.. A Users Guide to the Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC Version GSD 2.1. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology. University of Arkansas. April 1988.Google Scholar
Diebel, P.L., Taylor, D.B., and Bade, S.S.. “Barriers to Low Input Agriculture Adoption: A Case Study of Richmond County, Virginia.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 8(1993): 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, T.L., Leddy, M.G., and Smolick, J.D.. “Factors Influencing the Economic Potential for Alternative Farming Systems: Case Analysis in South Dakota.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3(1998):26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faeth, P. “Evaluating Agricultural Policy and the Sustainability of Production Systems: An Economic Framework.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48(1993):94–99.Google Scholar
Goldstein, W.A. and Young, D.L.. “An Agronomic and Economic Comparison of a Conventional and a Low Input Cropping System in the Palouse.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 2(1987):51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, C.R. and Zilberman, D.. “Pesticides and Worker Safety.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2(1992):68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmers, G.A., Langemeier, M.R., and Atwood, J.. “An Economic Analysis of Alternative Cropping Systems for East-Central Nebraska.” American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1(1986):153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hons, F.M. and Saladino, V.A.. “Yield Contribution of Nitrogen Fertilizer, Herbicide, and Insecticide in a Corn Soybean Rotation.” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26(1995):3083–3097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.L., Adams, R.M., and Perry, G.M.. “The On-Farm Costs of Reducing Groundwater Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1991): 1063–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberg, E., Spear, R.C., and Zilberman, D.. “The Economics of Reentry Regulation of Pesticides.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):946–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Klepper, R., and Sweeney, S.. “Field Crop Production on Organic Farms in the Midwest.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33(1978): 130–134.Google Scholar
Mapp, H.P., Bernardo, D.J., Sabbagh, G.J., Geleta, S., and Watkins, K.B.. “Economic and Environmental Impacts of Limiting Nitrogen Use to Protect Water Quality: A Stochastic Regional Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(1994):889–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mjelde, J.W., Lacewell, R.D., Talpaz, H., and Taylor, C.R.. “Economics of Irrigation Management.” in Management of Farm Irrigation Systems, Hoffman, G.J., Howell, T.A., and Soloman, K.H. eds. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Monograph ST. Joseph, MO. 1990. 1040 pp.Google Scholar
Ritter, W.F., Scarborough, R.W., and Chirnside, A.E.M.. “Herbicide Leaching in Coastal Plain Soil.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 120(1994):634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, G. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” The Annals of Statistics 6(1978):461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C.R. “A Flexible Method for Empirically Estimating Probability Functions.” Western Journal of Agriculture Economics 9(1984):66–76.Google Scholar
Texas Crop Statistics. Texas Agricultural Statistics Service. Texas Department of Agriculture. Austin, TX. Appropriate Issues.Google Scholar
Texas Agricultural Statistics Service. 1992 Texas Custom Rates Statistics. Texas Department of Agriculture. Austin, TX.Google Scholar