Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:42:55.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Analysis of the Effects of Feed Ingredient Price Risk on the Selection of Minimum Cost Backgrounding Feed Rations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Brian K. Coffey
Brian K. Coffey*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546-0276
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The traditional minimum cost feed ration linear programming model is expanded to permit risk management responses to price variability associated with feeding a particular ration across time. The cost minimizing objective function also considers feed costs in a mean-variance (E-V) framework. The model is specified using NRC nutrient requirements and an historic Feedstuffs price series. A decision-maker can choose his/her optimal ration by making tradeoffs between price risk and net income. The results should provide a basis for decision tools that allow livestock producers to manage the net income risk involved in the selection of a feed ration.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , August 2001 , pp. 353 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.R., Dillon, J.L., and Hardaker, J.B.Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Boisvert, R.N., and McCarl, B.A.Agricultural Risk Modeling Using Mathematical Programming. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 356. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, July 1990.Google Scholar
Dillon, C.R. “Microeconomic Effects of Reduced Yield Variability Cultivars of Soybeans and Wheat.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 24,1(1992):121–133.Google Scholar
Dillon, C.R. “Production Practice Alternatives for Income and Suitable Field Day Risk Management.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 31,2(1999):247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, R. “The Introduction of Risk into a Programming Model.” Econometrica. 21(1956):253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardaker, J.B., Huirne, R.B.M., and Anderson, J.R.Coping With Risk in Agriculture. New York, NY: CAB International, 1997.Google Scholar
Ingredient Market Report. Feedstuffs. Various issues 1981 to 1999.Google Scholar
Kentucky Agricultural Statistics Service. Kentucky Agricultural Statistics 1998-99. National Agricultural Statistics Service of USDA and Kentucky Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Levy, H. and Markowitz, H. “Approximating Expected Utility by a Function of Mean and Variance.” American Economic Review. 69(1979):308–317.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H.M.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1959.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A. and Spreen, T.H.Applied Mathematical Programming Using Algebraic Systems. 1997. Unpublished, available at the URL: http://agrinet.tamu.edu/mccarl/regbook.htm.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. “Two-Moment Decision Models and Expected Utility Maximization.” American Economic Review. 77(1987):421–430.Google Scholar
Preston, R.L. “Feed Composition Guide.” BEEF Vol. 33, No. 8, January 1997.Google Scholar
Prevatt, J.W., Melton, B.E., Spreen, T.H., Mathis, W.K. “The Economics or Carcass Beef Production: An Appraisal of Florida's Feedlot Potential.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 10,2(1978):49–55.Google Scholar
Stigler, G.J. “The Cost of Subsistence.” Journal of Farm Economics. 27(1945):303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C, DeLorenzo, M.A., Beede, D.K., and Spreen, T.H. “Predicting Daily Feed Costs for Dairy Management Models.” Journal of Dairy Science. 27(1992):3109–3121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, J. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Toward Risk.” Review of Economic Studies. 25(1958):65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neuman, J. and Morganstern, O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Waugh, F.V. “The Minimum-Cost Dairy Feed.” Journal of Farm Economics. 33(1951):299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar