Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:17:17.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural Economics Research and The Experiment Station System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

David L. Debertin  and
Garnett L. Bradford
David L. Debertin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Garnett L. Bradford
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of agricultural economics research within the land-grant university system. Fundamental differences between research in the biological sciences and the social sciences are delineated. Implications of these differences for experiment station research programs are discussed. Recommendations are made which have potential for enhancing the role of agricultural economics within colleges of agriculture.

Keywords

Agricultural Experiment Stationagricultural economicsresearch
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 1987 , pp. 195 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnen, J.T..“Historical Sources of U.S. Agricultural Productivity: Implications for R&D Policy and Social Science Research.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65 (1983):963–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, G.L.. Boling, J. A., Rutledge, S. R., and Moss, T.W.. “Management Systems For Beef Cattle Backgrounding: A Multidisciplinary Approach.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 10 (1978):57–62.Google Scholar
Breimyer, H. F. “The Three Economies of Agriculture.” J. Farm. Econ., 44(1962):679–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, T. E., and Weston, J. F.. Financial Theory and Corporate Policy. 2nd ed. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley, 1983.Google Scholar
Hightower, J. Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1973.Google Scholar
Kohls, R. L. “Economic Research and Education for Commercial Agriculture.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 56(1974):1012–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, W. B., and Busch, L.. “Guardians of the Discipline: Journals and Journal Editors in the Agricultural Sciences.” Rural Sociology, 47(1982):442.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., and Miller, M.. “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment.” Amer. Econ. Rev., 48(1958):261–297.Google Scholar
Peterson, W., and Hayami, Y.. “Technical Change in Agriculture.” In A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature. Ed. Martin, Lee R.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. J. “Social Science Implications of Agricultural Science and Technology.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 65 (1983):977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, M. J., and Dalrymple, D. G.. “U.S. and Agricultural Research Assessment: Implications for Agricultural Economists.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, E. “Revitalizing The Land Grant University.” CHOICES, 2, 1 (1986):6–10.Google Scholar
Spillman, W. J. “Applications of the Law of Diminishing Returns to Some Fertilizer and Feed Data.” J. Farm Econ., 5(1923):36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. C., and Havlicek, J. Jr. “Optimal Expenditures for Agricultural Research and Extension: Implications of Underfunding.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ., 64(1982):47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar