Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:34:11.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accounting for Spatial Characteristics of Watersheds in Evaluating Water Pollution Abatement Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Zeyuan Qiu  and
Tony Prato
Zeyuan Qiu
Affiliation:
Center for Agricultural, Resource and Environmental System (CARES), Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia
Tony Prato
Affiliation:
Center for Agricultural, Resource and Environmental System (CARES), Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study evaluates three agricultural nonpoint pollution abatement policies: regulating the spatial pattern of agricultural activities, ambient tax, and abatement tax/subsidy. All three policies incorporate spatial characteristics of agricultural emission loading and movement for an agricultural watershed in the Midwest. The effects of spatial variation in natural conditions and landscape features on agricultural emissions and crop yield are evaluated using a newly developed biophysical simulation model and experimental data. While the policies are equally cost effective in reducing agricultural nonpoint source pollution, their implementation feasibility is quite different.

Keywords

atrazineenvironmental policynonpoint pollutionsimulationwatershed managementwater quality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , April 1999 , pp. 161 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, R.W., Landman, J.C., and Cameron, D.M.. The Clean Water Act 20 Years Later. Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.G. and Allen, P.M.. “Estimating Hydrologic Budgets for Three Illinois Watersheds.” Journal of Hydrology 176(1996): 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J.G., Williams, J.R., Srinivasan, R., King, K.W., and Griggs, R.H.. SWAT: Soil and Water Assessment Tool. USDA ARS, Temple, TX, 1994.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J. and Oates, W.E.. “The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment.” Swedish Journal of Economics 73(1971): 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingner, R.L. “Runoff Simulated from Goodwin Creek Watershed using SWAT.” Trans-ASAE 39(1996): 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, J.B., Johnson, G.V., Bouzaher, A., and Miltz, D.. “Optimal Spatial Management of Agricultural Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(1989): 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braden, J.B., Larson, R.S., and Herricks, E.E.. “Impact Targets versus Discharge Standards in Agricultural Pollution Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(1985): 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.. Release 2.25 GAMS: A User's Guide. Danvers, MA: Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, M.E. and Lacewell, R.D.. “Implications of Alternative Policies on Nitrate Contamination of Groundwater.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1996): 82–95.Google Scholar
Dillon, P.J. and Kirchner, W.B.. “The Effects of Geology and Land Use on the Export of Phosphorus from Watersheds.” Water Resources 9(1975): 135–148.Google Scholar
Fleming, R.A. and Adams, R.M.. “The Importance of Site-Specific Information in the Design of Policies to Control Pollution.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33(1997): 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, A. M. III, Haveman, R.H., and Kneese, A.V.. The Economics of Environmental Policy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1973.Google Scholar
Griffin, R.C. and Bromley, D.W.. “Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality: A Theoretical Development.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(1982): 547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenreich, L.K., Zhou, Y., and Prato, T.. Economic and Environmental Assessment of Alternative Farming Systems at the Watershed Scale. Research Report No. 19. CARES, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 1995.Google Scholar
Helfand, G.E. and House, B.W.. “Regulating Non-point Source Pollution Under Heterogeneous Conditions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995): 1024–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R.B. Jr. and Clausen, J.C.. “Land Use Monitoring and Assessment for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control.” Perspectives on Nonpoint Source Pollution: Proceedings of a National Conference, Kansas City, MO, May 19–22, 1985. US EPA, Washington, DC, 1985.Google Scholar
Horner, G.L. “Internalizing Agricultural Nitrogen Pollution Externalities: A Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(1975): 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.J. and Casier, G.L., “Internalizing Externalities of Phosphorus Discharges from Crop Protection to Surface Water: Effluent Taxes versus Uniform Reductions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61(1979): 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J.J. and Timmons, J.F.. “An Economic Analysis of Agricultural Land Use Practices to Control Water Quality.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56(1974): 791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivak, J.A. “Best Management Practices to Control Nonpoint source Pollution From Agriculture.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 33(1978): 161–166.Google Scholar
Larson, D.M., Helfand, G.E., and House, B.W.. “Second-Best Tax Policies to Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996): 1108–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missouri MSEA Management Team. The Missouri Management Systems Evaluation Area Research and Education Report: 1990–1995, Columbia, MO, 1995.Google Scholar
Omernik, J.M.The Influence of Land Use on Stream Nutrient Levels, Ecology Resource Service, EPA-600/3-76-014, EPA, Washington DC, 1976.Google Scholar
Pan, J.H. and Hodge, I.. “Land Use Permits as An Alternative to Fertilizer and Leaching Taxes for the Control of Nitrate Pollution.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 45(1994): 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prato, Tony. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, 1998.Google Scholar
Qiu, Zeyuan. Integrated Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution in Goodwater Creek Watershed, Missouri. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 1996.Google Scholar
Robinson, C.A., Ghaffarzadeh, M., and Cruse, R.M.. “Vegetative filter strip effects on sediment concentration in cropland runoff.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50(1996): 227–230.Google Scholar
Schultz, R.C., Colletti, J.R, Isenhart, T.M., Simpkins, W.W., Rodrigues, C.A., Wray, P., Thompson, M.L., and Pease, J.. “Riparian Buffer Strip Systems the Improve Water Quality.” Clean Water-Clean Environment-list Century, Team Agriculture-Working to Protect Water Resources, Conference Proceedings, Volume III: 235–238, Kansas City, MO, March 5–8, 1995.Google Scholar
Segerson, K. “Uncertainty and Incentives for Non-point Pollution Control.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15(1988): 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T.H. “Derived Decision Rules for Pollution Control in a General Equilibrium Space Economy.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1(1974): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietenberg, T.H.Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, second edition. Scott, Foresman and Company: Glenview, IL, 1988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Cost and Returns Estimator: Users Manual. Lino Lakes, MN: Midwest Agricultural Research Associates, Inc., 1988.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. National Water Quality Inventory: 1992 Report to Congress. Washington DC, EPA 841-R-94-001, March 1994b.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. “Relationships between Drainage Area Characteristics and Nonpoint Source Nutrients in Streams.” National Eutrophication Survery Workers Paper No. 25, 1974.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. News-Notes No. 34(1994a): 5–6.Google Scholar
Water Environment Federation. A National Water Agenda for the 21st Century. Water Environment Federation/Water Quality 2000, Alexandria, VA, 1992.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Segerson, K.. “The Impact of Policies and Land Characteristics on Potential Groundwater Pollution in Wisconsin.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1995): 1033–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar