Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:37:32.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Waste Water Treatment Costs in Poultry Rendering Plants in Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Harold B. Jones Jr.  and
Waldon R. Kerns
Harold B. Jones Jr.
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division of the Economic Research Service, USDA
Waldon R. Kerns
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Poultry products are an important source of agricultural income in Georgia and other southeastern states. Yet, the waste from poultry operations can lower water quality unless ways are found to reduce quantities discharged into streams and waterways. Present regulations require that all sewage discharged from processing and rendering plants have the equivalent of secondary stage treatment as defined by conventional biological standards [4]. More stringent regulations that would completely eliminate discharge of pollutants into waterways have been proposed [10]. Poultry processing and rendering plants must therefore adopt more advanced in-plant processes or private treatment systems or utilize public systems to achieve higher levels of waste water treatment in future years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , December 1974 , pp. 65 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Davis, J. G., et.al.. “Processing of Poultry By-Products and Their Utilization in Feeds.” Utilization Research Report No. 3, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., p. 3, Nov. 1961.Google Scholar
[2]Environmental Protection Agency. Industrial Waste Study of the Meat Products Industry. Chap. 5, Poultry Processing, Jan. 1972.Google Scholar
[3]Gates, Charles D. “The Disposal of Domestic Wastes in Rural Areas.” Agriculture and the Quality of Our Environment AAAS 85, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington D.C., p. 376, 1967.Google Scholar
[4]Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division. Waste Treatment and Permit Requirements: Rules of the Georgia Water Quality Control Board. Atlanta, Ga., pp. 730–736, March 1965.Google Scholar
[5]Kahle, H. S., and Gray, L. R.. Utilization and Disposal of Poultry By-Products and Wastes. Marketing Research Report 143, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., p. 27, Nov. 1956.Google Scholar
[6]Kahle, H. S., and Lortscher, L. L., et.al. Processing Poultry By-Products in Poultry Slaughtering Plants. Marketing Research Report 181, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., June 1957.Google Scholar
[7]Kerns, Waldon R., and Holemo, Fred J.. Cost of Waste Water Pollution Abatement in Poultry Processing and Rendering Plants in Georgia. ERC-0673, Environmental Resources Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, pp. 26–30, June 1973.Google Scholar
[8]Mountney, George J.Poultry Products Technology. Westport, Conn.: AVI Publishing Co., pp. 246–255, 1966.Google Scholar
[9]O'Mara, G. K., and Bender, F. E.. “The Dilemma of Environmental Quality.” Maryland Agri-Economics, University of Maryland Cooperative Extension Service, May 1973,Google Scholar
[10] U.S. Congress, House Conference Report on S. 2770. “Amending the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.” Congressional Record, Sept. 28, 1972.Google Scholar
[11]U.S. Dept. of Interior. “Industrial Waste Profile No. 8, Meat Products.” Cost of Clean Water, Vol. 3, Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Washington, D.C., Sept. 1967.Google Scholar
[12]Vertrees, James G.The Poultry Processing Industry: A Study of the Impact of Water Pollution Control Costs. Marketing Research Report 965, Economic Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., p. 25, June 1972.Google Scholar