Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:52:24.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vertical Integration for Risk Management: An Application to a Cattle Ranch*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert E. Whitson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Range Science
Peter J. Barry
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Ronald D. Lacewell
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Extract

Substantial variations in equity and income of cattle producers and feeders in highly leveraged operations have occurred during the early 1970s as the result of wide variations in prices of cattle and purchased feed. Moreover, severe losses in many commercial feedlots have resulted in greater forage inputs in beef production, with feeder cattle placed in feedlots at heavier weights and for shorter periods of time. The large price uncertainty, together with possible changes in the livestock production system, make cattle producers' search for effective methods of risk management more urgent.

The search is hampered, however, by a limited scope of choices in risk management. Forward price commitments in cattle production have received limited use at the producer level. Public programs of price support and supply management have never been available. Insurance choices are few, as are alternatives for diversifying use of grazing lands and other resources specialized to cattle production. Often, producers' primary methods of risk-bearing are reliance on financial reserves, including unused borrowing capacity, emergency loans provided by public programs and outside sources of income. However, effective opportunities for reduction of income variability may be offered by vertical integration expressed as retention of calf ownership through finishing stages either on pasture or by custom feeding in commercial feedlots.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Technical Article No. 12261 of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

[1] Barry, P. J. and Baker., C.B.Reservation Prices on Credit Use: A Measure of Response to Uncertainty,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(1971):222227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Barry, P.J. and Willmann., D.R.A Risk Programming Analysis of Forward Contracting with Credit Constraints,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, in press.Google Scholar
[3] Boykin, C. C.Economic and Operational Characteristics of Cattle Ranches, Texas High Plains and Rolling Plains, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication 866, January 1968.Google Scholar
[4] Kennedy, R. P.Texas Brush Problems and Rangeland Productivity: An Economic Evaluation of the Rolling Plains Land Resource Area,” Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, 1970.Google Scholar
[5] Logan, S. H.A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Economics of Vertical Integration,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(1969):834849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Sharp, W. W. and Boykin., C.C.A Dynamic Programming Model for Evaluating Investments in Mesquite Control and Alternative Beef Cattle Systems, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Monograph 4, September 1967.Google Scholar
[7] USDA, Consumer and Marketing Service, Livestock Division. Detailed Quotations, Amarillo, Texas, Market, 1969-1973.Google Scholar
[8] Whitson, R. E.Evaluating the Relationship Between Income and Uncertainty for a Texas Ranch Organization,” Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University,. 1974.Google Scholar
[9] Whitson, R. E.Ranch Decision-Making under Uncertainty—an Illustration,Journal of Range Management, 28(1975):267270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar