Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:39:26.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Business Management Games as Research Tools in Food Retailing — A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Larry D. Jones
Larry D. Jones*
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Article No. 74-1-149
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Performance in the food retailing industry varies over time, among competitive markets, and among different organizational affiliations. This paper reports the results of a recent study which examined variation in firm behavior and performance which could be attributed to three phenomena: differences in organizational affiliation, differences among managers within an organizational affiliation, and differences in the competitive environment under which retailers operate. This study differed from some previous behavioral studies in that an experimental business management game was used as the data generator. A central thrust of this study was to evaluate business gaming as a tool which allowed testing of hypotheses concerning economic behavior.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , July 1975 , pp. 205 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Aronson, Elliot and Carlsmith, J. M.. “Experimentation in Social Psychology,” Handbook of Social Psychology, Lindsey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds.), Addison-Wesley Publication Co., Reading, 1968, pp. 1–79.Google Scholar
[2] Babb, E. M. Purdue Supermarket Chain Management Game, EC-434, Indiana Cooperative Extension Service, Lafayette, March 1974.Google Scholar
[3] Babb, E. M. and Bohl, L. P.. “Experimental Gaming—Application to Input Marketing,” Farm/Ranch Input Research, Nelson, P. E. (ed.), May 1973, pp. 173–191.Google Scholar
[4] Babb, E. M., Leslie, M. A. and Van Slyke, M. D.. “The Potential of Business Gaming Methods in Research,” Journal of Business, Vol. 39, No. 4, October 1966, pp. 465–472.Google Scholar
[5] Baumol, W. J. Economic Dynamics, Macmillan and Co., New York, 1959.Google Scholar
[6] Cohen, K. J. “Simulation of the Firm,” American Economic Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, May 1960, pp. 534–540.Google Scholar
[7] Campbell, D. T. “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 54, No. 4, July 1957, pp. 297–312.Google Scholar
[8] Cyert, R. M. and Hedrick, C. L.. “Theory of the Firm: Past, Present and Future; An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10, No. 2, June 1972, pp. 398–412.Google Scholar
[9] Friedman, J. W. “On Experimental Research in Oligopoly,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 108, October 1969, pp. 399–416.Google Scholar
[10] Roland, K. M. and Gardner, D. M.. “The Use of Business Gaming in Education and Laboratory Research,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, April 1973, pp. 268–283.Google Scholar
[11] Shubik, M. A. “A Curmudegon's Guide to Microeconomics,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 8, No. 2, June 1970, pp. 405–434.Google Scholar
[12] Simon, H. A. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, No. 1, February 1955, pp. 99–118.Google Scholar
[13] Weick, K. E. “Laboratory Experimentation with Organizations,” Handbook of Organization, March, J. G. (ed.), Rand McNally, Chicago, 1965, pp. 194–260.Google Scholar