Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:02:30.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Probabilistic Cash Flows in Analyzing Investments Under Conditions of Risk and Uncertainty*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

James W. Richardson  and
Harry P. Mapp Jr.
James W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Harry P. Mapp Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Managers of business firms, large or small, farm or nonfarm, must make investment decisions under conditions of risk and uncertainty. However, in evaluating investments, the assumption of perfect knowledge has often been used to simplify the analysis. For example, an estimate of average annual net returns is frequently discounted into perpetuity to evaluate a real estate investment alternative. Capital budgeting literature suggests a number of approaches to evaluating alternative investments. However, use of concepts such as the payback period, average rate of return, internal rate of return and net present value embodies the assumption of perfect knowledge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1976 , pp. 19 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Journal Article J-3175 of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors benefited from suggestions made by Odell Walker, Clint Roush and the reviewers for this Journal.

References

[1] Adler, Michael. “On Risk Adjusted Capitalization Rates and Valuation by Individuals,” Journal of Finance, Volume 25, September 1970.Google Scholar
[2] Agricultural Production Systems Simulation. Eidman, Vernon R., Editor, Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, May 1971.Google Scholar
[3] Baumol, William J. “Portfolio Theory: The Selection of Asset Combinations,” Morristown, N.Y.: General Learning Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[4] Blume, Marshall E. “On the Assessment of Risk,” Journal of Finance, Volume 26, March 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Burt, Oscar R. and Finley, Robert M.. “Statistical Analysis of Identities in Random Variables,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 50, No. 3, August 1968.Google Scholar
[6] Byrne, R., Charnes, A., Cooper, A. and Kartanek, K.. “Some New Approaches to Risk,” Accounting Review, Volume 63, January 1968.Google Scholar
[7] Cassidy, P.A., Radgers, J.L. and McCarthy., W.O. “A Simulation Approach to Risk Assessment in Investment Analysis,” Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, March 1970.Google Scholar
[8] Engler, George M.Business Financial Management, Dallas: Business Publications, Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
[9] Environmental Data Service. “Climatological Data, New Mexico,” Asheville, N.C.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Monthly, 1965-75.Google Scholar
[10] Halter, A.N. and Dean., G.W.Decisions Under Uncertainty, Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing Co., 1971.Google Scholar
[11] Hirshleifer, J. “On the Theory of the Optimal Investment Decision,” Journal of Political Economy, 66(1958):329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Jones, G. T.Simulation and Business Decisions, Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books Ltd., 1972.Google Scholar
[13] Kryzanowski, Lawrence, Lusztig, Peter and Schwab, Berhard. “Monte Carlo Simulation and Capital Expenditure Decisions—A Case Study,” The Engineering Economist, Volume 18, Fall 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Levy, Haim and Sarnat, Marshall. “Two-Period Selection and Investors’ Discount Rate,” Journal of Finance, Volume 26, September 1971.Google Scholar
[15] Lewellen, Wilbur G. and Long, Michael S.. “Simulation Versus Single Value Estimates in Capital Expenditure Analysis,” Decision Sciences, Volume 4, No. 4, 1972.Google Scholar
[16] Markowitz, Harry M.Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, New York: Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1959.Google Scholar
[17] Myers, Stewart C. “Procedures for Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty,” Industrial Management Review, Volume 9, Spring 1968.Google Scholar
[18] Naylor, Thomas H.Computer Simulation Experiments with Models of Economics Systems, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
[19] Officer, R. R. and Halter., A.N. “Utility Analysis in a Practical Setting,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 56, No. 3, 1974.Google Scholar
[20] Poliquen, Louis Y.Risk Analysis in Project Appraisal, World Bank Staff Occasional Paper, No. 11, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[21] Reutlinger, Shlomo. Techniques for Project Appraisal Under Conditions of Uncertainty, World Bank Staff Occasional Paper, No. 10, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
[22] Robichek, A. and Myers, S.. “Risk Adjusted Discount Rate,” Journal of Finance, Volume 24, No. 4, 1966.Google Scholar
[23] Rubinstein, Mark S. “A Mean-Variance Synthesis of Corporate Financial Theory,” Journal of Finance, Volume 28, March 1972.Google Scholar
[24] Sprow, Frank B. “Evaluation of Research Expenditures Using Triangular Distribution Functions and Monte Carlo Methods,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Volume 59, No. 7, July 1967.Google Scholar
[25] Swirles, John and Lusztig, Peter A.. “Capital Expenditure Decisions Under Uncertainty,” Cost and Management, September 1968, pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
[26] Tobin, James. “The Theory of Portfolio Selection,” The Theory of Interest Rates, Hahn, F. and Brechling, F., Editors, New York: McMillian, 1965, pp. 3–50.Google Scholar
[27] Walker, Odell L. and Nelson, A. Gene. “Designing Research and Education Programs Related to Decision-Making under Uncertainty: A Working Paper,” Presented at a meeting of the Southern Agricultural Management Research Work Group, Athens, Georgia, January 1976.Google Scholar