Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:55:27.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure of South Central Agricultural Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Rudolph A. Poison  and
C. Richard Shumway
Rudolph A. Poison
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, formerly a Research Assistant, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
C. Richard Shumway
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using a dual economic specification of a multiproduct technology, the structure of agricultural production was tested for five South Central states (Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana). A comprehensive set of output supplies and input demands comprised the estimation equations in each state. Evidence of nonjoint production in a subset of commodities was detected in four of the five states. Several commodities also satisfied sufficient conditions for consistent aggregation. However, the specific outputs satisfying each structural property varied by state. Sufficient conditions for consistent geographic aggregation across the states were not satisfied. These results provide empirical guidance and important cautions for legitimately simplifying state-level model specifications of southern agricultural production.

Keywords

dual modelsgeographic aggregationnonjointnessseparability
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 1990 , pp. 153 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, V.E. “Modeling Supply Response in a Multiproduct Framework”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988):813–825.Google Scholar
Chambers, R.G. Applied Production Analysis: A Dual Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Cochrane, W.W., and Ryan, M.E.. American Farm Policy 1948-1973. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1976.Google Scholar
Evenson, R. State-Level Data Set for U.S. Agriculture 1949-1982. Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Unpublished, 1986.Google Scholar
Hall, R.E., “The Specification of Technology with Several Kinds of Outputs”. J. Pol. Econ., 81(1972)878–892.Google Scholar
Houk, J.P., Abel, M.E., Ryan, M.E., Gallagher, P.W., Hoffman, R.G., and Penn, J.B.. Analyzing the Impacts of Government Programs on Crop Acreage. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1548, 1976.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, D.W. and Lau, L.J.. “The Structure of Consumer Preferences”. Annals Econ. and Soc. Measurement, 41(1975)49–101.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J. “Applications of Profit Functions”. Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Fuss, M. and McFadden, D., eds., Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978. Chapter 1.3, Vol 1.Google Scholar
Lau, L.J. “Profit Functions of Technologies with Multiple Inputs and Outputs”. Rev. Econ. Stat., 54(1972)281–289.Google Scholar
Lim, H. “Profit Maximization, Returns to Scale, Separability, and Measurement Error in State-Level Agricultural Technology”. Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, 1989.Google Scholar
Lopez, R.E. “Estimating Substitution and Expansion Effects Using a Profit Function Framework”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 66(1984):358–367.Google Scholar
Pope, R.D. and Hallam, A.. “Separability In Production Economics”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988): 142–152.Google Scholar
Romain, R.F.J. “A Commodity Specific Policy Simulation Model for U.S. Agriculture”. Ph.D.Thesis, Texas A& M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, T.J. Efficient Estimation with A Priori Information. Cowles Foundation Monograph 23, Yale University, 1973.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R. “Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):748–760.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R. and Alexander, W.P.. “Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 870(1988):154–161.Google Scholar
Shumway, C.R., Pope, R.D. and Nash, E.K.. “Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling: Reply”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988):950–952.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Prices. Annual series, 1949-1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Annual series, 1948-1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Commodity Fact Sheets. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. Annual bulletins, 1972-1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Farm Labor. Annual series, 1949-1980.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Farm Real Estate Market Development. Economics, Statistics, and Cooperative Service. Annual series, 1980-1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Feed Situation. Economic Research Service. Annual series, 1949-1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Field Crop Production, Disposition and Value. Economics Statistics and Cooperative Services. Annual series, 1949-1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. State Farm Income and Balance Sheet Statistics. ESCS Statistical Bulletin, 1949-1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Wheat Situation. Economic Research Service. Annual series, 1949-1984.Google Scholar
Weaver, R.D. “Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 65(1983):45–56.Google Scholar