Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:04:30.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Structure of Farmers’ Perceptions of Ground Water Pollution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

A. H. Elnagheeb ,
J. L. Jordan  and
Vonda Humphrey
A. H. Elnagheeb
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station, Griffin, GA
J. L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station, Griffin, GA
Vonda Humphrey
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Georgia Experiment Station, Griffin, GA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from a 1992 Georgia Farm Practices survey are used to examine the structure of farmers' perceptions of ground water pollution and their support of regulations to protect ground water. Estimates of the influence of farm and farmer characteristics on pollution perceptions and support for pollution control were computed using a multiple-indicator model. Results show that the willingness to change farm practices to protect ground water is positively related to how an operator perceives the seriousness of the pollution problem. Regulatory policies that negatively affect farmers' income are likely to be opposed by farmers.

Keywords

factor analysislatent variable modelwater quality
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1995 , pp. 224 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clarke, J. S., and McConnell, J. B.. Georgia Ground-Water Quality. U.S. Geological Survey Water – Supply Paper 2325, 1986.Google Scholar
Dunlap, R. and Van Liere, K. D., “Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality.” Social Science Quarterly 65(1984): 1013–1028.Google Scholar
Ferris, J. M. “Demands for Public Spending: An Attitudinal Approach.” Public Choice 40(1983): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, J. M. “Interrelationships Among Public Spending Preferences: A Micro Analysis.” Public Choice. 45(1985): 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgia Agricultural Statistic Service, Georgia Agricultural Facts. 1993 Edition.Google Scholar
Gillespie, G. W. Jr. and Buttel, F. H.. “Understanding Farm Operator Opposition to Government Regulation of Agricultural Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals: The Role of Social Class, Objective Interests, and Ideology.” American J. of Alternative Agr. 3(1989): 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grämlich, E. M., and Rubinfeld, D. L.. “Micro Estimates of Public Spending Demand Functions and Tests of the Tiebout and Median-Voter Hypotheses.” J. Polit. Econ. 90(1982):536–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H.Modern Factor Analysis. (2nd edition.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D. “Demand for National Public Goods: Estimates from Surveys.” Econ. Inq. 23(1985):487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoiberg, E. O. and Bultena, G. L.. “Farm Operator Attitudes toward Governmental Investment in Agriculture.” Rural Sociology 46(1981):381–390.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D.. “Simultaneous Analysis of Longitudinal Data from Several Cohorts.” In Cohort Analysis in Social Research: Beyond the Identification Problem, edited by Mason, W. M. and Fienberg, S. E.. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D.. LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables, and Least Squares Methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc., 1986.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G., and Sorbom, D.. LISREL VII: User's Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
Kalton, G., and Schuman, H.. “The Effect of the Question on Survey Responses: A Review.” J. R. Statist. Soc. 145A(1982):42–73.Google Scholar
Keeney, D. R. “Sources of Nitrate to Groundwater.” In Nitrogen Management and Ground Water Protection, edited by Follett, R. F.. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.Google Scholar
Kellog, R. L., Maizei, M. S., and Goss, D. W.. “The Potential for Leaching of Agrichemicals used in Crop Production: A National Perspective.” J. of Soil and Water Conserv. 49(1994):294–298.Google Scholar
Lee, L. K. and Nielsen, G.. “Groundwater: Is It Safe to Drink?” Choices 3(1989):4–7.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, E. and Lessley, B. V.. “Water Quality, Cost-Sharing, and Technical Assistance: Perceptions of Maryland Farmers.” J. of Soil and Water Conserv. 47(1992):260–264.Google Scholar
Napier, T. L. and Brown, D. E.. “Factors Affecting Attitudes Toward Groundwater Pollution Among Ohio Farmers.” J. of Soil and Water Conserv. 48(1993):432–439.Google Scholar
Napier, T. L., Camboni, S. M., and Thraen, C. S.. “Environmental Concern and the Adoption of Farm Technologies.” J. of Soil and Water Conserv. 41 (1986): 109–113.Google Scholar
Pease, J. and Bosch, D.. “Relationships among Farm Operators' Water Quality Opinions, Fertilization Practices, and Cropland Potential to Pollute in Two Regions of Virginia.” J. of Soil and Water Conserv. 49(1994):477–483.Google Scholar
Rahm, M. “EPA Survey Finds U.S. Well Water Safe.” Cargill Bulletin (December 1990):4–5.Google Scholar
Sarnat, C. L., Willis, C. E., and Harper, C. R.. “Choosing Alternatives to Contaminated Groundwater Supplies: A Sequential Decision Framework Under Uncertainty.” Northeastern J. Agr. and Resour. Econ. 16(1987): 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schokkaert, E. “Preferences and Demand for Local Public Spending.” J. Public Econ. 34(1987): 175–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, A. W., and Isaac, R. A.. “Water Quality From Private Wells in Georgia.” In Hatcher, K. J. [ed.] Proceedings of the 1991 Georgia Water Resources Conference, Institute of Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 1991.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Clean Water Act, Section 305, (b), State Reports, 1986.Google Scholar
Vitosh, M. L. “Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Producers.” Extension Bulletin WQ06, Cooperative Extension Service, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, August 1985.Google Scholar
Walker, D. R., and Hoehn, J. P.. “The Economic Damages of Groundwater Contamination in Small Rural Communities: An Application to Nitrates.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Econ. 12 (1990):47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A. D., Hatfield, J. L., Lamb, J. A., Alberts, E. E., Logan, T. J., Anderson, J. L.. “The Management Systems Evaluation Areas Program-Tillage.” Soil and Tillage Research 30(1994):49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar