Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:49:15.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Contract Grazing Feeder Cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Frank Johnson ,
Thomas H. Spreen  and
Timothy Hewitt
Frank Johnson
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Thomas H. Spreen
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Timothy Hewitt
Affiliation:
Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contract grazing feeder cattle is an arrangement where cattle owned by one party graze forage produced on land owned by another party. The forage producer is paid a fixed price per pound gained. Stochastic dominance analysis is used to compare contract grazing and the more traditional system in which the same individual owns both the cattle and land.

Keywords

feeder cattlestochastic dominanceriskfarm management
Type
Submitted Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 1987 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. “Risk Efficiency in the Interpretation of Agricultural Production Research.” Rev. of Marketing and Agri. Econ., 42, 3(1974):131–184.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R., Dillon, L., and Hardaker, J. B.. Agricultural Decision Analysis. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Florida Department of Agriculture. Livestock Market Report. Market News Bureau, Division of Marketing, Winter Park, FL, 1972-1983.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. H. “A Stochastic Dominance Analysis of Backgrounding Feeder Cattle in North Florida.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 1985.Google Scholar
Ross, J. A., Spreen, T. H., and Arnade, C.A.. “Costs and Returns of Overwintering Feeder Cattle in North Florida.” Agricultural Experiment Station Report No. 183, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, June 1983.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. R., and Alderman, R.. “Seasonality of Florida Feeder Cattle Prices.” Florida Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin No. 214, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, February 1985.Google Scholar
Spreen, T. H., and Arnade, C. A.. “The Use of Forecasts in Decision Making: The Case of Stocker Cattle in North Florida.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 16(1984):145–150.Google Scholar
Spreen, T. H., Ross, J. A., Pheasent, J. W., Moore, J. E., and Kunkle, W. E.. “A Simulation Model for Backgrounding Feeder Cattle in Florida.” Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 850, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, May 1985.Google Scholar
USDA. Agricultural Prices Annual Summary. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1960-1984.Google Scholar
Ward, R. W., and Schimkat, G. E.. “Risk Ratios and Hedging: Florida Feeder Cattle.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 11, 1(1978):71–77.Google Scholar