Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:42:00.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Economics and Other Social Sciences in Biotechnology Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Joseph Havlicek Jr
Joseph Havlicek Jr*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Biotechnology research promises to have a greater impact on agriculture and society as a whole than any other technological development in agriculture in the past (such as hybrid corn) or any in the foreseeable future. Biotechnology research potentially encompasses a multitude of technological developments that are likely to impact all aspects of agriculture from agricultural production to food processing to food consumption and possibly even to waste and residuals management, pollution control and water quality.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , July 1990 , pp. 69 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fishel, , Walter, L. “Considerations in Conducting Biotechnology Impact Studies.” Economic and Sociological Occasional Paper 1191, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, March, 1985.Google Scholar
Fishel, , Walter, L. “The Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology: Discussion.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69:2 (May, 1987):438–439.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi. “Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrics, 25 (October, 1957):501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueth, , Darrell, L.,and Just, Richard E.. “Policy Implications of Agricultural Biotechnology.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69:2 (May, 1987):426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalter, , Robert, J., and Tauer, Loren W.. “Potential Economic Impacts of Agricultural Biotechnology.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69:2 (May, 1987):420–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, , Martin, . Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Lemieux, , Catherine, M., and Wohlgenant, Michael K.. “Ex Ante Evaluation of the Economic Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Porcine Somatotropin.” Am. J. Agr. Econ. 71:4 (November, 1989):903–914.Google Scholar
Martin, , Marshall, A., and Joseph, Havlicek Jr. “Some Welfare Implications of the Adoption of Mechanical Cotton Harvesters in the United States.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 59:4 (November, 1977):739–744.Google Scholar
Schmitz, , Andrew, , and Seckler, David. “Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 52:4 (November, 1970):567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellschopp, , Jack, , and Kalter, Robert J.. “Bovine Somatotropin: Its Impacts on the Spatial Distribution of the U.S. Dairy Industry.” A.E. Research 89-14, Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (September, 1989):203.Google Scholar
Stallman, , Judith, I., and Schmid, A. Allan. “Property Rights in Plants: Implications for Biotechnology Research and Extension.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69:2 (May, 1987):432–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweeten, , Luther, , and Welsh, Mike. “The Economics of Agricultural Biotechnology: Discussion.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 69:2 (May, 1987):440–442.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing. Structure of American Agriculture: Summary. Washington, DC, 1986.Google Scholar
White, , Fred, C, and Joseph, Havlicek Jr. “Optimal Expenditures for Agricultural Research and Extension: Implications of Underfunding.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 64:1 (February, 1962):47–55.Google Scholar