Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:43:11.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response—External Finance: A Necessary Component in Growth Projections for Southern Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John B. Penson Jr
John B. Penson Jr*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The discussion of my paper by Emanuel Melichar presented elsewhere in this issue of the Journal initially focuses on use of mathematical notation when discussing concepts and theory in the absence of corresponding empirical estimates. Apparently attempting to demonstrate how a relatively simple task—illustrating the areas in which financing considerations should be included in sector projections models—was made difficult by using “hieroglyphics,” Melichar summarizes the equations in my paper with brief, one sentence descriptive statements. Unfortunately, he chooses to ignore the fact that economic relationships inherent in each equation were discussed so that “decoding by faithful readers” is not required by those uninterested in issues related to specification of variables or aggregate model design.

Type
Comments and Replies
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , July 1977 , pp. 207 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Birch, Eleanor M. and Siebert, Calvin D.. “Uncertainty, Permanent Demand, and Investment Behavior,” American Economic Review, 66, 1976,15–27.Google Scholar
[2]Bischoff, Charles W. “Hypothesis Testing and the Demand for Capital Goods,” Review of Economic Studies, 23, 1969, 345–369.Google Scholar
[3]Coen, Robert M. “Investment Behavior, The Measurement of Depreciation and Tax Policy,” American Economic Review, 65, 1975, 59–74.Google Scholar
[4]Cromarty, William A. “The Demand for Farm Tractors, Machinery and Trucks,” Journal of Farm Economics, 41, 1954, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eisner, Robert and Ishag, M. Nadiri. “Investment Behavior and Neoclassical Theory,” Review of Economic Studies, 22, 1968, 369–382.Google Scholar
[6]Griliches, Zvi. “The Demand for a Durable Input: Farm Tractors in the United States, 1921-57,” in Harberger, A. C., Ed., The Demand for Goods, Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
[7]Heady, Earl O. and Tweeten, Luther G.. Resource Demand and Structure of the Agricultural Industry, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Holthausen, Duncan M. “Input Choices and Uncertain Demand,” American Economic Review, 66, 1976, 94–103.Google Scholar
[9]Jorgenson, Dale W. and Stephenson, Joseph A.. “Issues in the Neoclassical Theory of Investment Behavior,” Review of Economic Studies, 23,1969, 346–353.Google Scholar
[10]Leland, Hayne E. “Theory of the Firm Facing Uncertain Demand,” American Economic Review, 62, 1972, 278–291.Google Scholar
[11]Melichar, Emanuel. “Aggregate Farm Capital and Credit Flows Since 1950 and Projections to 1980,” Agriculture Finance Review, 33,1972, 1–7.Google Scholar
[12]Penson, John B. Jr., Hughes, Dean W. and Nelson, Glenn L.. “Measurement of Capacity Depreciation Based Upon Engineering Data,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59,1977, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Penson, John B. Jr. “Towards an Aggregative Measure of Saving and Capital Finance,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59,1977, 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]U.S. Department of Agriculture.Balance Sheet for the Farming Sector, ERS Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 403, September 1976.Google Scholar