Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:08:18.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply: Energy Accounting: The Case of Farm Machinery in Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Phillips Foster
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park
Dennis Wichelns
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Resource Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park

Extract

The most important issue raised in the comment by Bradford involves the problem of how to handle the fact that, although the logical period for accounting for energy use on the farm is one year, farm machinery is typically used over a period of several years. No solution to this problem will be entirely satisfactory, and the alternative offered by Bradford has its own difficulties. Nevertheless, the Bradford alternative is worth trying, and this response to the comment will consider briefly his proposal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradford, Garnett L.Comment: Energy Accounting: The Case of Farm Machinery in Maryland.S. J. Agri. Econ. 13 (1981) No. 1.Google Scholar
Foster, P., Flemming, J., Wichelns, and D.Energy Accounting: The Case of Farm Machinery in Maryland.” S. J. Agri. Econ. 12(1980a).189–92.Google Scholar
Foster, P., Flemming, J., Wichelns, D., Roberts, and L.Fossil Fuel Energy Used In Agriculture, A Data Base For Maryland—1974.” Research Bulletin, Md. Agr. Exp. St., December, 1980b.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. L., Hurd, L. E., Bellotti, A. C., Foster, M. J., Oka, I. M., Sholes, O. D., and Whitman, R. J.Food Production And The Energy Crisis.” Science 182(1973):443–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed