Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:31:12.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Protection of Agricultural Land: An Institutionalist Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

J. C. Hite
Affiliation:
Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
B. L. Dillman
Affiliation:
Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina

Extract

For a long time, the consensus of old farmers sitting around crossroads stores has been that, sooner or later, America is going to run out of agricultural land because of all the houses, shopping centers, and highways that are spreading out onto the nation's cropland. And for years, such observations have been summarily dismissed as the ravings of ignorant men with too much time on their hands. Yet in the last half of the 1970s, a significant part of the educated elite in the United States began to suspect that those old farmers just might be correct. The farm press began to run articles concerning the loss of prime agricultural land to urban sprawl (Johnson); some of the more prestigious national journals appealing to educated laymen began to publish articles on the subject (Blundell); and even general circulation newspapers that seldom deign to print anything other than stories on political corruption or murder and mayhem devoted space to feature-length articles warning of the loss of cropland to non-agricultural uses (Burnside).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blundell, William E.As World Needs Food, U.S. Keeps Losing Soil to Land Developers.” Wall Street Journal, October 24, 1980, p. 1.Google Scholar
Burnside, Susan. “Dade's Farms May Soon Sprout Condos.” Miami Herald, October 6, 1980, Section B, p. 1.Google Scholar
Corty, F. L.Non-Market Land Use Controls at the Local Level,” Land Use Needs and Policy Alternatives, Proc. Workshop on Land Use, Charleston, SC, Southern Land Economics Research Committee Publication No. 14, October 1975, pp. 125–47.Google Scholar
Cotner, Melvin L.Land Use Policy and Agriculture: A National Perspective. ERS, USDA, ERS-630, 1976.Google Scholar
Cousins, C. F.An Analysis of the Conversion of Prime Agricultural Land in the Greenville-Spartanburg-Pickens SMSA,” unpublished M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Clemson University, Clemson, S.C., December 1980.Google Scholar
Crevecoeur, St. John. Letters from an American Farmer. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith, 1968 (reprint 1782 London edition).Google Scholar
Crosson, P.Implications for Land Use in the U.S. Demand for Food and Fiber.” Paper presented at National Symposium on Land Use: Tough Choices in Today's World,” Omaha, March 21-24, 1977.Google Scholar
Derr, Don, Small, Leslie, and Dhillon, Pritam. “Criteria and Strategies for Maintaining Agriculture at the Local Level.” J. Soil and Water Conserv. 32(1977): 118–22.Google Scholar
Dideriksen, R. I., Hildebaugh, A. R., and Schmude, K. O., Potential Cropland Study. Washington: USDA, Soil Conservation Service Station Bulletin No. 578, 1977.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. Delworth. “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 59(1977)1027–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotesky, R.The Nature of Myth and Society.American Anthropologist. 54(1952): 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, E. O. and Timmons, J. R.U.S. Land Needs for Meeting Food and Fiber Demands.J. Soil and Water Conserv. 30(1975): 1522.Google Scholar
Hildebaugh, A. R.National Agricultural Lands Study, Agricultural Lands Data Sheet, America's Land Base in 1977—1000 Acres.” USDA and Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, June 1980.Google Scholar
Hite, J. C., Macauley, H. H., Stepp, J. M., and Yandle, T. B.The Economics of Environmental Quality. Washington: American Enterprises Institute, 1972.Google Scholar
Johnson, Bill. “A Plan That Pays You to Preserve Land for Farming.” Progressive Farmer. November 1979, pp. 2425.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. W. B.The American Adam. Chicago and London: Phoenix Books, University of Chicago Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Little, Charles E.The Demise of the Jeffords Bill.” American Land. p. 7, 8, 1980.Google Scholar
Luttrell, Clifton B.Our Shrinking Farmland: Mirage or Potential Crises?Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 62( 1980): 1118.Google Scholar
Madden, J. Patrick and Brewster, David E., eds. A Philosopher Among Economists, Selected Works of John M. Brewster. Philadelphia: J. T. Murphy Co., 1970.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Richard B.Restrictions on Business Mobility: A Study in Political Rhetoric and Economic Reality. Washington: American Enterprises Institute, 1979.Google Scholar
Morrow, Josiah, ed. Tours into Kentucky and the Northwest Territory. Three Journals by the Rev. James Smith of Powhatan County, VA, 1783–1795–1797.” Ohio Archeological and Historical Quarterly. 16(1907): 396.Google Scholar
Mundy, S. Darrell. “Interrelationships Between Spatial Distribution of Agricultural Land and Land Requirements for Future Food and Fiber Production.Land Use Needs and Policy Alternatives, Southern Land Economics Research Committee Publication No. 14, 4163, October 1975.Google Scholar
National Agricultural Lands Study. The Program of Study: Interim Report Number One. USDA and Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, March 1980.Google Scholar
Peterson, George E. and Yampolsky, Harvey. Urban Development and the Protection of Metropolitan Farmland. Washington: The Urban Institute, 1975.Google Scholar
Plaut, T. R.Urban Expansion and the Loss of Farmland in the U.S.: Implications for the Future.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):537–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Alan. Resource Economics. Columbia, Oh: Grid Publishing, Inc. 1980.Google Scholar
Raup, Phillip M.Urban Threats to Rural Lands: Background and Beginnings.J. Amer. Inst, of Planners. 41(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shebba, Gregor. “Symbol and Myth in Modern Rationalists Societies,” in Truth, Myth, and Symbol, Altizer, Thomas J., Beardslee, William A., and Young, J. Harvey, eds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry Nash. Virgin Lands: The American West as Symbol and Myth. New York: Vintage Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Ward, John William. Andrew Jackson—Symbol for an Age. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Ziemitz, Kathryn A.Urban Pressure on Rural Land.” Rural Development Perspectives. March 1980, pp. 4749.Google Scholar