Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:18:34.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Considerations of Emerging Information Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Thomas L. Sporleder
Thomas L. Sporleder*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Adoption of computerized decision analysis and computerized communications technology in many agricultural production and marketing situations will occur rapidly in the next decade. Computer hardware, such as microcomputers and large central processors, has become more reliable while costs have declined dramatically. Coupled with this has been the escalating costs of people and product transportation.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , July 1984 , pp. 15 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, James B., ed. Proceedings of Electronic Marketing Conferences. Publication No. 448-003, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, January, 1983.Google Scholar
Boggs, C. L. “TELCOT: From Concept to Commercialization.” National Symposium on Electronic Marketing of Agricultural Commodities. MP-1463, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, March, 1980, pp. 43–50.Google Scholar
Fuller, Earl I. “Microcomputers: Useful in all Agricultural Economics and Extension.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64 (1982):978–985.Google Scholar
Guither, Harold D. ed., Who Will Control U.S. Agriculture? Special Publication 27, University of Illinois, August, 1972.Google Scholar
Harsh, Stephen B. “The Developing Technology of Computerized Information Systems.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):908–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayenga, Marvin L. “Market Information and Price Reporting in Thinly Traded or Imperfect Markets.” Market Information and Price Reporting in the Food and Agricultural Sector. NC-117 Monograph No. 11, University of Wisconsin-Madison, March, 1980.Google Scholar
Henderson, Dennis, Schrader, Lee, and Rhodes, V. James. “Public Price Reporting.” Marketing Programs in Agriculture: Issues and Options. Danville, Illinois: The Interstate Printers and Publishers, Inc., 1983.Google Scholar
Holder, David L. and Sporleder, Thomas L.. “Forward Deliverable Contract Markets.” Marketing Alternatives for Agriculture. National Policy Education Committee Publication No. 7, Cornell University, Ithaca, November, 1976.Google Scholar
Infanger, Craig L., Robbins, Lynn W., and Debertin, David L.. “Interfacing Research and Extension in Information Delivery Systems.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):915–920.Google Scholar
Sporleder, Thomas L. “CATTLEX: A Computerized Cash Market for Feeder Cattle.” National Symposium on Electronic Marketing of Agricultural Commodities. MP-1463, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, March, 1980, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
Sporleder, Thomas L. “Emerging Information Technologies and Agricultural Structure.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983), 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Agriculture. Information Technology for Agricultural America. Subcommittee on Department Operations, Research, and Foreign Agriculture Committee Print, Washington, D.C., December, 1982.Google Scholar
U.S. National Commission of Libraries and Information Science. Public Sector/Private Sector Interaction in Providing Information Services. Washington, D.C., 1982.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Report of the Secretary's Meat Pricing Task Force. Office of the Secretary, Washington, D.C., June 15, 1979.Google Scholar