Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:39:50.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the Specification of Wage Rates in Cost-Push Models of Food Price Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Mike Belongia*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

Extract

Since publication of Popkin's work on price determination by state of processing, cost-push models of “inflation” have provided the theoretical structure underlying much of the empirical analysis of food price behavior. The general premise of such models is that the price (usually a component of the Consumer Price Index) of a commodity can be expressed as the summation of that commodity's price in a less processed form, plus the cost of all resources expended in the physical transformation of the commodity to its current form. Then, if the costs of raw farm produce or other factors of production used by food processing firms increase, cost-push models predict that retail food prices will increase at some future date. It is argued that price increases at the retail level occur because market power of processing and retail firms permits them to “pass through” increased costs of production by increasing the prices of their output. Or, “because of their oligopolistic structure, these [food manufacturing] firms are able to select the prices at which they sell” (Lamm, p. 119). Similarly, Heien (p. 11) states that “an operationally more realistic theory is one where store managers apply a markup over costs for each product in order to arrive at a price.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baltan, Dallas S.Inflation: The Cost-Push Myth.” Federal Reserve Board of St. Louis, Review 63 (1981):2026.Google Scholar
Belongia, Mike and King, Richard A.Alternative Models of Food Price Behavior and the Distinction Between Real and Nominal Values.Mimeo, N.C. State University, 1981.Google Scholar
Feige, E. and Pearce, D. K.The Causal Causal Relationship Between Money and Income: Some Caveats for Time Series Analysis.Rev. Econ. Statis. 61(1979):521–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C.J, W.Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.Econometrica 37(1969):42438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. and Newbold, Paul. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.J. Econometrics 2(1974): 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heien, DaleMarkup Pricing in a Dynamic Model of the Food Industry.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980): 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFall, Lamm R.Dynamics of Food Price Inflation.Western J. Agr. Econ. 4(1979): 119-32.Google Scholar
McFall, Lamm R. and Wescott, Paul C.The Effects of Changing Input Costs on Food Prices.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 63(1981): 187–96.Google Scholar
Moore, Basil J.Monetary Factors,” in Eichner, Alfred S., ed., A Guide to Post-Keynesian Economics, New York: M. E. Sharpe Co., 1979, pp. 120–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, David A.Relationships—and the Lack Thereof—Between Economic Time Series with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates.J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 72(1977): 1122.Google Scholar
Popkin, Joel. “Consumer and Wholesale Prices in a Model of Price Behavior by Stage of Processing.Rev. Econ. Statis. 56(1974):486501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Christopher A.Money, Income and Causality.Amer. Econ. Rev. 62(1972):540–52.Google Scholar