Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:39:13.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model of the Stubble Replacement Decision for Florida Sugarcane Growers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Donald R. Crane  and
Thomas H. Spreen
Donald R. Crane
Affiliation:
Agricultural Cooperative Development International, University of Florida
Thomas H. Spreen
Affiliation:
Agricultural Cooperative Development International, University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sugarcane has been cultivated since at least 8000 B.C. (Barnes, p. 2) and today is grown throughout the world's tropical and subtropical regions. In Florida, sugarcane has been produced commercially since 1920 (Zepp). Before 1960, however, Florida sugar production was not significant; only three mills were in operation. With the ban on importation of Cuban sugar and the lifting of domestic sugarcane acreage restrictions in 1960, the industry grew rapidly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1980 , pp. 55 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. J. Jr., Kidder, G., and Gascho, G. J.. “Predicting Tons of Sugarcane per Acre Using Solar Radiation, Temperature and Percent Plant Cane, 1971 Through 1976.” Proc. Amer. Soc. Sugar Cane Technologists. 7(1978):18–22.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J., Kidder, G., and Snyder, G. H.. “The Economic Potential for Growing Rice and Sugarcane in Rotation in the Everglades.” Proc. Soil and Crop Sci Soc. Fla. 38(1979).Google Scholar
Barnes, A. C.The Sugar Cane. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
Burt, O. R. “Economic Replacement.” SIAM Rev. 5(1963):203–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, O. R. ”Optimal Replacement Under Risk. “ J. Farm Econ. 47(1965):324–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, A. H. “Criteria for Determining the Optimum Replacement Pattern.” J. Farm Econ. 48(1966):107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Donald R. “The Sugarcane Stubble Replacement Decision for South Florida.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Florida, 1979.Google Scholar
Faris, J. E. “Analytical Techniques Used in Determining the Optimum Replacement Pattern.” J. FarmEcon. 42(1960):755–66.Google Scholar
Gallant, A. R. “Nonlinear Regression.” Am. Statistician. 29(1975):73–81.Google Scholar
Grant, E. L., Ireson, W. G., and Leavenworth, R. S.. Principles of Engineering Economy. New York: The Ronald Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hildreth, C. and Reiter, S.. “On the Choice of a Crop Rotation Plan,” in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, T. C. Koopmans, ed., pp. 177-88. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
Hillier, F. S. and Lieberman, G. J.. Operations Research. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. “A General Mathematical Theory of Depreciation.” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 20(1925): 340–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, G. and Lyrene, P. M.. “A Traveler’s Guide to Florida Sugarcane.” Agronomy Facts No. 59. Belle Glade: AREC, University of Florida, 1976Google Scholar
le Grand, F.Production of Sugar Cane. Agron. Mono. No. 1. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1972.Google Scholar
Mao, J. C. T.Quantitative Analysis of Financial Decisions. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc., 1969.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. and Purcell, W. D.. “A Quantitative Approach to the Feedlot Replacement Decision.” S. J. Agr. Econ. 4(1972):143–9.Google Scholar
Perrin, R. K. “Asset Replacement Principles.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 54(1972):60–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, R. K. and Proctor, E. A.. The Economics of Replacing Apple Trees — A Guide for Producer Decision Making. Econ. Info. Rep. No. 36, North Carolina State University, 1974.Google Scholar
Preinreich, G.D.A. “The Economic Life of Industrial Equipment.” Econometrica. 8(1940):12–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terborgh, G.Dynamic Equipment Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1949.Google Scholar
Walker, C. Costs and Returns from Sugarcane in South Florida. CES Cir. 374. Gainesville: University of Florida, 1972.Google Scholar
Ward, L. E. and Faris, J. E.. A Stochastic Approach to Replacement Policies for Plum Trees. Giannini Foundation Mono. No. 22, University of California, 1960.Google Scholar
Zepp, G. A. “The Florida Sugar Industry: Its Past, Present, and Future Prospects.” USDA Sugar and Sweetener Rep. 1(1976):45–50.Google Scholar