Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:27:54.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Microenterprise-Centered Economic Development Strategy for the Rural South: Sustaining Growth with Economic Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ralph D. Christy ,
Mark D. Wenner  and
Wylin Dassie
Ralph D. Christy
Affiliation:
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Mark D. Wenner
Affiliation:
Micro Enterprise Unit, InterAmerican Development Bank, Washington, DC
Wylin Dassie
Affiliation:
Interdenominational Theological Center, Atlanta, GA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Microenterprise programs (MEPs) have become an important research concern and rural development strategy in international development circles. The basic premise of this approach is that microenterprises , that is firms with fewer than 10 employees, can be provided with a series of small loans that allow them to start or expand productive activities and thereby increase incomes and escape poverty. Governments and donor agencies have expanded funding for microfinance programs in low-income countries and more articles appear in the Western media about the success of this new approach in assisting the poor.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2000 , pp. 331 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahiarah, S. “Black Americans’ Business Ownership Factors: A Theoretical Perspective.” The Review of Black Political Economy 22 (Fall 1993):15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asociacion de Entidades Financieras Especializadas en Microfinanzas (ASOFIN). Informe sobre la Evolución de la Cartera. La Paz, Bolivia. 1999.Google Scholar
Bates, T. “Why Do Minority Business Development Programs Generate So Little Minority Business Development?” Economic Development Quarterly 9:1(1995). 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. “Reply to Raheim,” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurs hip 1:1(1996). 27–29.Google Scholar
Bates, T.Race, Self-employment, and Upward Mobility: An Illusive American Dream. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Bates, T. and Servon, L.J. “Why Loans Won't Save the Poor,” Inc. April 18, 1996. 27–28.Google Scholar
Bates, T. and Servon, L.J. “Microenterprise as an Exit Route from Poverty: Recommendations for Programs and Policy Makers,” forthcoming in Journal of Urban Affairs, [email protected], servon® rci.rutgers.edu. 1998.Google Scholar
Benus, J.M., Johnson, T.B., Wood, M., Grover, N., and Shen, T.. “Self-Employment Programs: A New Re-employment Strategy, Final Report on the UI Self-employment Demonstration,” Unemployment Insurance Occasional Paper 95-4, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 1995.Google Scholar
Benus, J.M., Wood, M., and Grover, N.. “A Comparative Analysis of the Washington and Massachusetts UI Self-Employment Demonstrations,” Unemployment Insurance Occasional Paper 94-3, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 1994.Google Scholar
Brown, D.L. “Human Ecology Perspectives on Spatial Development Policy in the United States.” Eds. Miklin, Michael and Postan, Dudley, Continuities in Sociological Human Ecology, New York: Plenum Press. 1997.Google Scholar
Calmeadow Foundation. The MicroBanking Bulletin Issue No.3, July 1999.Google Scholar
Calmeadow Foundation. Microfinance and Poverty: Questioning the Conventional Wisdom. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C. 1998.Google Scholar
Handy, J., and Swinton, D.H.. “The Determinants of the Rate of Growth of Black Owned Businesses: A Preliminary Analysis.” The Review of Black Political Economy 12 (Spring 1984):85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, D. and Mosley, P.. Finance Against Poverty, Volumes I and II. London:Routledge. 1996.Google Scholar
Jansson, T. and Wenner, M.. “Financial Regulation and its Significance for Microfinance in Latin America and the Caribbean”. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C. 1997.Google Scholar
Khandker, S.R. “Grameen Bank: Impact, Costs, and Program Sustainability,” Asian Development Review, 14,1 (1996):97–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraybill, D.S. and Weber, B.A.. “Institutional Change and Economic Development in Rural America.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (December 1995):1265–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W.A.Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 22(1954):139–91.Google Scholar
Morduch, J. “Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence From Flagship Programs in Bangladesh,” manuscript, Princeton, jmorduch® wws.princeton.edu. 1998.Google Scholar
Morduch, J. “The Microfinance Promise,” manuscript, Princeton, [email protected]. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, P. and Hulme, D.. “Microenterprise Finance: Is There a Conflict Between Growth and Poverty Alleviation?” World Development 26,5 (1998):783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navajas, S., Schreiner, M., Meyer, R.L., Gonzalez, C.-Vega, and Rodriguez-Meza, J.. “Microfinance and the Poorest of the Poor: Theory and Evidence From Bolivia,” manuscript, The Ohio State University, www-agecon.ag.ohio-state.edu/RuralFinance/page5.html. 1998.Google Scholar
O'Hare, W. “Black Business Ownership In The Rural South.” The Review of Black Political Economy 15 (Winter 1990):93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, M.M. and Khandker, S.R.. “The Impact of Group-based Credit Programs on Poor Households in Bangladesh: Does the Gender of the Participants Matter?” J. Political Economy 106,5 (1998):958–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M.E. “The Competitive Advantage of the Inner City.” Harvard Business Review (May-June 1995):55–71.Google Scholar
RESULTS International. “The Microcredit Summit Declaration and Plan of Action,” J. Developmental Entrepreneurship 1,2 (1996):131–176.Google Scholar
Rhyne, E. and Rotblatt, L.. “What Makes Them Tick? Exploring the Anatomy of Major Microenterprise Finance Organizations,” ACCION International Monograph Series No. 9, Washington, D.C. 1994.Google Scholar
Rural Revitalization Task Force. A Hard Look at USDA's Rural Development Programs. A Report to the Secretary of Agriculture, June 30, 1989.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.K. “Microenterprise in the United States: Rationale and Outcomes”, manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis, sandersc® gwbmail.wustl.edu. 1998.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M. “A Review of Evaluations of Microenteiprise Programs in the United States,” Center of Social Development, Washington University in St. Louis. 1999.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M. “The Context for Microenterprise and for Microenterprise Programs in the United States and Abroad”, Center for Social Development, Washington University in St. Louis. 1998.Google Scholar
Severens, C.A. and Kays, A.K.. 1996 Directory of U.S. Microenterprise Programs. Aspen Institute, Washington, D.C. 1997.Google Scholar
Ssewamala, F. and Britt, D.. “Microenterprise as a Policy Alternative in Dealing With Poverty,” manuscript, Washington University in St. Louis, [email protected], [email protected]. 1998.Google Scholar
Superindendencia de Bancos y Entidades Financieras de la República de Bolivia. 1999. Boletín Informativo. No. 131. JulioGoogle Scholar
Vosloo, W.B. Editor Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth. Pretoria: HSRC Publisher, 1994.Google Scholar