Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:18:56.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Methods for Evaluating Economic Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Richard L. Kilmer
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Florida
Walter J. Armbruster
Affiliation:
Oak Brook, Illinois

Extract

An economically efficient allocation of resources maximizes consumer and producer surpluses. It can be shown that under perfectly competitive conditions, an efficient allocation of resources will evolve. It may be the global welfare optimum, but for a given set of conditions, consumer and producer surpluses can be maximized.

Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, K.J.Vertical Integration and Communication.Bell J. Econ. 6(1975):173183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boles, James N.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: The Farrell Approach.University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, Working Paper No. 157, October 1980.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W.Land and Water Problems: An Institutional Perspective.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):834844.Google Scholar
Brown, James N. and Rosen, Harvey S.. “On the Estimation of Structural Hedonic Price Models.Econometrica. 50(1982):765768.Google Scholar
Buccoala, S. T. and French, B.C.. “Long-Term Marketing Contracts: Intra-Firm Optima and Inter-Firm Agreements.Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 61 (1979):648656.Google Scholar
Carl, Ella, Kilmer, Richard L. and Kenny, Lawrence W.. “Evaluating Implicit Prices of Intermediate Products.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):592595.Google Scholar
Farrell, Maurice J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.J. Royal Stat. Soc. 120(1957):253281.Google Scholar
Forsund, Finn R., Lovell, C.A. Knox and Schmidt, Peter. “A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of Their Relationship to Efficiency Measurement.J. Econometrics 13(1980):525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Ben C.The Analysis of Productive Efficiency in Agricultural Marketing: Models, Methods, and Progress.” pp. 91206 in A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gardner, Bruce. “Efficient Redistribution through Commodity Markets.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):225234.Google Scholar
Just, Richard E. and Hueth, Darrell L.. “Welfare Measures in a Multimarket Framework.Amer. Econ. Rev. 69(1979): 947954.Google Scholar
Kilmer, Richard L. and Hahn, David E.. “Effects of Market-Share and Antimerger Policies on the Fluid Milk-Processing Industry.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 60(1978):385392.Google Scholar
Kilmer, Richard L., Spreen, Thomas and Tilley, Daniel S.. “A Dynamic Plant Location Model: The East Florida Fresh Citrus Packing Industry.Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):730737.Google Scholar
Kilmer, Richard L. and Ward, Ronald W.. “Simulating the Performance of a Multiple Exchange Mechanism Market.So.J. Agr. Econ. 14(1982):1721.Google Scholar
King, Richard A.The Frontier Production Function: A Tool for Improved Decision Making.J. Northeastern Agr. Coun. 9(1980):110.Google Scholar
Kopp, Raymond J.The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: A Reconsideration.Quart. J. Econ. (1981):477503.Google Scholar
Kopp, Raymond J. and Diewert, W. Erwin. “The Decomposition of Frontier Cost Function Deviations into Measures of Technical and Allocative Efficiency.J. Econometrics. 19(1982):319331.Google Scholar
Ladd, George W.Value Judgements and Efficiency in Publicly Supported Research.So. J. Agr. Econ. 15(1983): 17.Google Scholar
Lau, Lawrence J.Profit Functions of Technologies with Multiple Inputs and Outputs.Rev. Econ. Stat. 54(1972):281289.Google Scholar
Lau, Lawrence J. and Yotopoulos, Pan A.. “Profit, Supply and Factor Demand Functions.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 54(1972):1118.Google Scholar
Logan, Samuel H.A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Economies of Vertical Integration.Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 51 (1969):834848.Google Scholar
Lutton, Thomas J.Input Demand Formulations and Duality Theory.Agr. Econ. Res. 34(1982):1522.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael P.Mythical Demands and Mythical Supplies for Proper Estimation of Rosen's Hedonic Price Model.J. Urban Economics. 14(1983):327337.Google Scholar
Nerlove, Mark. Dynamics of Supply. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Perry, Martin K.Vertical Integration: The Monopoly Case.Amer. Econ. Rev. 68(1978):561570.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.J. Polit. Econ. 82 (1974):3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seitz, Wesley D.The Measurement of Efficiency Relative to a Frontier Production Function.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 52(1970):505511.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J.The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market.J. Polit. Econ. 59(1951):185193.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Dennis J. and Tatham, Ronald T.. “An Improved Long-Run Model for Multiple Warehouse Location.Manage. Sci. 22(1976):748758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, T.D.Measures of Social Costs of Agricultural Programs.J. of Farm Econ. 44(1962):580594.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert D.Multiple Input, Multiple Output Production Choices and Technology in the U.S. Wheat Region.Amer.J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):4556.Google Scholar
Willig, Robert D.Consumer's Surplus Without Apology.Amer. Econ. Rev. 66(1976):589597.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E.Market and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations.Amer. Econ. Rev. 63(1973):316325.Google Scholar
Yotopoulos, Pan A. and Lau, Lawrence J.. “A Test for Relative Economic Efficiency: Some Further Results.Amer. Econ. Rev. 63(1973):2l4223.Google Scholar