Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:09:02.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Least-Cost Livestock Production Rations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John R. Allison
Affiliation:
Georgia Experiment Station
D. M. Baird
Affiliation:
Georgia Experiment Station

Extract

Animal scientists and agricultural economists have been working together to answer the question, “What is the least-cost feed mix for a given set of prices?” In the 1950's sophisticated mathematical programming via computers generated a renewed interest in ration formulation. Since then, animal scientists and agricultural economists have been intrigued with determing least-cost rations for various livestock species. But this research has been devoted to determining the least-cost rations rather than minimizing feed cost per pound of gain or pound of product produced and/or minimizing total cost per pound of gain or product produced. Answering the latter question is a prime goal of animal nutrition research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Aunan, W. J., Hanson, L. E., and Meade, R. J.. “Influence of Level or Dietary Protein on Live Weight Gains and Carcass Characteristics of Swine.Journal of Animal Science, 20:148153, Feb. 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bitney, Larry L., and Moser, Bobby T.. ‘Nebraska Swine Report 1974,” University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
[3]Brown, William G., and Arscott, E. H.. “Animal Production Functions and Optimum Rations Specifications.Journal of Farm Economics, 42:6978, Feb. 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Carlisle, G. R.Soaring Feed Cost Demand Protein Shifts.” National Hog Farmer, pp. 3638, March 1973.Google Scholar
[5]Hale, O. M., and Southwell, B. L.. “Differences in Swine Performance and Carcass Characteristics Because of Dietary Protein Level, Sex, and Breed.Journal of Animal Science, 26:341344, March 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Jensen, A. H., Acker, D. C., Maddock, H. M., Ashton, G. C., Homeyer, P. G., Heady, E. O., and Catron, D. V.. “Different Protein Levels With and Without Antibiotics for Growing-Finishing Swine: Effect on Growth Rate and Feed Efficiency.Journal of Animal Science, 14:6981, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Meade, R. J.Influence of Protein Content of a Diet and of Chlortetracycline and/or Vitamin B12 Supplementation Upon Performance of Growing-Fattening Pigs.Journal of Animal Science, 15:297306, Feb. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Meade, R. J., Vermedahl, L. D., Rust, J. W., and Wass, D. F.. “Effects on Protein Content of the Diet of the Young Pig on Rate and Efficiency of Gain During Early Development and Subsequent to 23.5 Kg. and Carcass Characteristics and Composition of Lean Tissue.Journal of Animal Science, 28:473477, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] N. R. C., “Nutrient Requirements of Swine,” Bulletin 1599, National Academy of Science, Washington, D.C., 1968.Google Scholar
[10]Purcell, J. C., and Elrod, J. C.. “Price-Related Risk in the Swine-Pork Sector,” University of Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report No. 154, May 1973.Google Scholar
[11]Rahman, Sabir A., and Bender, E. F.. “Linear Programming Approximation of Least-Cost Feed Mixes with Probability Restrictions.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53:612618, Nov. 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Seerley, R. W., Poley, G. E., and Wahlsterom, R. C.. “Energy and Protein Relationship Studies with Growing-Finishing Swine.Journal of Animal Science, 23:10161021, Nov. 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Seymour, E. W., Speer, V.C., Hays, V. W., Mangold, D. M., and Hazen, T. E.. “Effects of Dietary Protein Level and Environmental Temperature on Performance and Carcass Quality of Growing-Finishing Swine.Journal of Animal Science, 23:375379, May 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar