Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:46:41.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indiana Farm-Level Impacts of Possible Environmental Protection Agency Bans on Selected Soybean Insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Christopher M. Cashman ,
Marshall A. Martin  and
Bruce A. McCarl
Christopher M. Cashman
Affiliation:
Animal Health Products Division, Smith-Kline Corporation
Marshall A. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University
Bruce A. McCarl
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In spite of the economic benefits of insecticides to farmers and consumers, growing concern about the potential health and environmental hazards of some insecticides has resulted in the investigation of many insecticides by the Environmental Protection Agency (Boraiko). The use of several insecticides has already been banned. Others are under review and their use may be banned or restricted in the future.

The Environmental Protection Agency must evaluate, monitor, and regulate a wide range of chemical compounds. To do so requires the collection and analysis of information on the environmental, health, and economic impacts of the use of many diverse chemicals. Though regulatory action by the Environmental Protection Agency may reduce health and environmental risks, such action can also alter the profitability and performance of a farming operation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1980 , pp. 147 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boraiko, Allen A. “The Pesticide Dilemma.” National Geographic, 157(1980):145–183.Google Scholar
Cashman, Christopher M. “Economic Implications of Pesticide Restrictions on Corn and Soybeans in Indiana: A Representative Farm Approach.” M.S. thesis, Purdue University, 1980.Google Scholar
Eichers, Theodore, Anderson, Thelma W., and Andrilenas, Paul. Farmers Use of Pesticides in 1976. USDA-ESCS, Agr. Econ. Rep. 418, Dec. 1978.Google Scholar
Headley, J. C. “Estimating the Productivity of Agricultural Pesticides.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 50(1968):13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarl, Bruce A.Repfarm Documentation. Mimeographed. Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, 1980.Google Scholar
McCarl, Bruce A.Candler, Wilfred V., HowardDoster, D., and Robbins, Paul R.. “Experience With Farmer Oriented Linear Programming for Crop Planning.” Can. J. Agr. Econ. 25(1977):17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of the State Statistician. Pesticide Use on Field Crops in Indiana in 1978. Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, 1979.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service. Indiana Crop and Livestock Statistics, Annual Crop and Livestock Summary — 1977. Department of Agricultural Statistics cooperating with Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, A78-1, June 1978.Google Scholar