Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:59:42.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incentivizing Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in Rice Production: The Case of Arkansas Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Nate Lyman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
L. Lanier Nalley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas

Extract

U.S. rice industry producers face pressure from consumers, suppliers, and the government to reduce the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with rice (Oryza sativa L.) production. Arkansas rice cultivar-specific net GHG emissions information allows models of paddy rice emissions. Baseline levels of profit, yield variance, and GHG emissions are established using extension data. Varietal selection is then optimized to maximize profits and minimize GHG emissions, both constrained and unconstrained by baseline yield variance. Carbon abatement functions are estimated to examine the effects of hypothetical carbon prices on varietal selection.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckman, J.F., and Hertel, T.W.. “Why Previous Estimates of the Cost of Climate Mitigation are Likely Too Low.” Working Paper No. 54, 2009 GTAP, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Bennett, D.California Rice Project to Strengthen Carbon Credit Market?Western Farm Press, 30 June 2011. Internet site: http://westernfarmpress.com/rice/california-rice-project-strengthen-carbon-credit-market?page=4 (Accessed August 8, 2011).Google Scholar
Brennan, J.P.Measuring the Contribution of New Varieties to Increasing Wheat Yields.Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics 52(1984):175–95.Google Scholar
Brye, K.R.Overview of the Carbon Credit Trading System and the Potential for Agricultural Soil Carbon Sequestration Associated with Arkansas Rice Production.” In: B.R. Wells Rice AAES Research Studies. Norman, R.J., Meullenet, J.-F., and Moldenhauer, K.A.K., eds., pp. 4450. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 571, 2008.Google Scholar
Brye, K.R. Personal communication. University of Arkansas, June 2012.Google Scholar
Figge, F.Bio-folio: Applying Portfolio Theory to Biodiversity.Biodiversity and Conservation 13(2004):822849.Google Scholar
Hazell, P.B.R., and Norton, R.D.. Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Heady, E. Economics of Agricultural Production and Resource Use. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1952.Google Scholar
Key, N.D., and Sneeringer, S.E.. “Carbon Markets and Methane Digesters: Potential Implications for the Dairy Sector.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43,4(2011):569–90.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-K., and McCarl, B.A.. “Uncertainty Discounting for Land-based Carbon Sequestration.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41,1(2009):111.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, E.Some Hard Truths about Agriculture and the Environment.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 1(2004):2433.Google Scholar
Lintner, J.Security Prices, Risk, and Maximum Gains from Diversification.The Journal of Finance 21(1965):587615.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959.Google Scholar
Mars. “Global Expert Joins Mars Food to Accelerate Scientific Advances in Rice Sustain-ability and Nutrition.” 2011. Internet site: www.mars.com/global/press-center/press-list/news-releases.aspx?SiteId=94&Id=2822 (Accessed March 10, 2011).Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A.Biofuels and Legislation Linking Biofuel Supply and Demand Using the FASOMGHG Model.” Presented at Duke University Nicolas Institute Conference titled “Economic Modeling of Federal Climate Proposals: Advancing Model Transparency and Technology Policy Development, Washington D.C., 2007.Google Scholar
McFadden, B., Nalley, L., and Popp, M.. “How Consumer Demand, Industry Pressure, and Government Policy Regarding Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Affect Producer Selection of Grain Cultivars.” Presented at the 2011 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christi, TX, February 5-8, 2011.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., and Barkley, A.. “Using Portfolio Theory to Enhance Wheat Yield Stability in Low-Income Nations: An Application in Yaqui Valley of Northwestern Mexico.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 35(2010):334417.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., Barkley, A., Watkins, B., and Hignight, J.. “Enhancing Farm Profitability through Portfolio Analysis: The Case of Spatial Rice Variety Selection.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41,3(2009):641–52.Google Scholar
Nalley, L., Popp, M., and Fortin, C.. “The Impact of Reducing Green House Gas Emissions in Crop Agriculture: A Spatial- and Production-Level Analysis.Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40,1(2011):6380.Google Scholar
Nyikal, R.A., and Kosura, W.O.. “Risk Preference and Optimal Enterprise Combinations in Kahuro Division of Murang'a District, Kenya.Agricultural Economics 32(2005):131–40.10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00012.xGoogle Scholar
Outlaw, J.L., Richardson, J.W., Bryant, H.L., Raulston, J.M., Knapeck, G.M., Herbst, B.K., Ribera, L.A., and Anderson, D.P.. “Economic Implications of the EPA Analysis of the CAP and Trade Provisions of H.R. 2454 for U.S. Representative Farms.” Agricultural and Food Policy Center Research Paper 09-2. Technical Bulletin No. RR-2009-2. TX: Texas A&M University, 2009.Google Scholar
Redmond, CH., and Cubbage, F.W.. “Portfolio Risk and Returns from Timber Asset Investments.” Land Economics 64(1988):325–37.10.2307/3146305Google Scholar
Reilly, J., and Paltsev, S.. “The Outlook for Energy Alternatives.” Presented at the Transition to Bioeconomy: Global Trade and Policy Issues, March 30-31, Washington D.C, 2009. Internet site: www.farmfoundation.org/news/articlefiles/1698John%20Reilly%20Paper%203-27-09.pdf (Accessed October 22, 2009).Google Scholar
Ridgewell, A., Singarayer, J., Hehterlington, A., and Valdes, P.. “Tacking Regional Climate Change by Leaf Bio-genoengineering.Current Biology 19(2009):146–50.10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.02519147356Google Scholar
Robison, L.J., and Brake, J.R.. “Application of Portfolio Theory to Farmer and Lender Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (1979) :158–64.10.2307/1239520Google Scholar
Rogers, C.W., Brye, K.R., Norman, R.J., Gasnier, T., Frizzell, D., and Branson, J.. “Methane Emissions from a Silt-Loam Soil Under Direct-Seeded, Delayed-Flood Rice Management.” In: B.R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2011. Norman, R.J. and Moldenhauer, K.A.K., eds. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 600, 2012.Google Scholar
Sanchirico, J.N., Smith, M.D., and Lipton, D.W.. “Ecosystem Portfolios: A Finance-Based Approach to Ecosystem Management.” Presented at the AERE Workshop 2005: Natural Resources at Risk, Jackson, WY, June 2005.Google Scholar
Schneider, U.A., and McCarl, B.A.. “Appraising Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Potentials: Effects of Alternative Assumptions.Agricultural Economics 35(2006):277–87.10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00162.xGoogle Scholar
Schultz, B. (March 2, 2011) Delta Farm Press. Internet site: http://deltafarmpress.com/rice/sustainability-rice-farming-lsu-agcenter-kellogg-co-collaborate (Accessed March 20, 2011).Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.Google Scholar
Slaton, N., Moldenhauer, K., and Gibbons, J.. “Rice Varieties and Seed Production.” Rice Production Handbook. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service, 2001 (Slaton, N., ed.).Google Scholar
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F. Rice, C. Scholes, B., and Sirotenko, O.. “Agriculture.” Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group HI to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007 (Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, PR., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A., eds.).Google Scholar
Tobin, J.Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk.The Review of Economic Studies 25(1958):6586.10.2307/2296205Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Preliminary Analysis of the Waxman Markey Discussion Draft: The Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 in the 111th Congress. Washington, DC: >U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.U.S.+Environmental+Protection+Agency,+2011.>Google Scholar
Wal-Mart Corporate-Sustainability Index. Internet site: www.walmartstores.com/Sustainability/9292.aspx (Accessed February 5, 2011).Google Scholar
Wilson, CE. Jr., Runsick, S.K., and Mazzanti, R.. “Trends in Arkansas Rice Production.” In: B.R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2009. Norman, R.J. and Moldenhauer, K.A.K., eds. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Series 581, 2010.Google Scholar