Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:45:00.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of Capital Gains Tax Treatments on Optimal Livestock Enterprise Selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

John T. Pounder
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Richard A. Schoney
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Gustof A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Extract

Current income tax provisions bear little resemblance to those enacted by the original law, the Revenue Act of 1913. Because of the progressive nature of the federal income tax, a need for special provisions for capital gains was recognized. In 1921, gains from the sale or disposition of capital assets and certain other capital items were identified and taxed differently from income from other sources. The capital gains provisions resulted in the separation of ordinary and capital gains income.

Gains and losses from the sale or exchange of a capital asset and other capital items are classified as either short- or long-term, depending on the period of time the property is held. Income from items held for less than the required period is taxed as ordinary income. Income from items held for longer than the required period receive preferential treatment only if the net long-term gain exceeds the net short-term capital loss. If long-term capital gains are realized, 60 percent of the excess gain is claimable as a deduction; the remaining 40 percent of the net gain is taxed at the taxpayer's ordinary tax rate. If the net short-term capital gain exceeds the net long-term loss, 100 percent of the excess is taxable at the normal rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bock, C. Allen, Griffin, Ronald J., and Royer, Joseph. “1979 Farm Income Tax Schools Workshop.” Urbana, Illinois: Publication Services, 1979.Google Scholar
Boehlje, J. D. and White, T. K.. “A Production Investment Decision Model of Farm Firm Growth.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 51(Aug. 1969):546–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussey, L. E.The Economic Analysis of Industrial Projects. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1978.Google Scholar
Commerce Clearing House, Inc. 1978 U.S. Master Tax Guide, 1978 edition.Google Scholar
Devino, Gary T. (Comment); Rodewald, Gordon E. Jr. (Reply). “A Method for Analyzing the Effect of Taxes and Financing on Investment Decisions.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 53 (Feb. 1971): 1346.Google Scholar
Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Treasury Department.Farmers Tax Guide, Pub. 225, 1979 edition.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Plaxico, S.. Growth and Capital Accumulation of Farms in the Rolling Plains of Oklahoma and Texas, USDA Tech. Bull. No. 1381, Sept. 1967.Google Scholar
Morten, George. “Dynamic Programming,” in Structural Independence of the Economy, Barna Tybar, ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Rodewald, Gordon E. Jr.A Method for Analyzing the Effects of Taxes and Financing on Investment Decisions.A mer. J. Agr. Econ. 51(Dec. 1969):1178-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, H. A. Jr.Evaluating Farm Investments by Capital Budgeting.J. Farm Econ. 44(Dec. 1962):1444-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, W. Fred, and Sisson, Charles A.. “The Significance of Capital Gains to Farmers and Some Effects of Eliminating Their Preferred Income Tax Treatment.S. J. Agr. Econ. 7(July 1975):145–52.Google Scholar