Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:51:36.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of Bona Fide Farmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Fred C. White
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia
Ivery D. Clifton
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics, University of Georgia

Extract

Georgia's General Assembly considered differential assessment legislation in 1976, but rejected the final proposals on the last day of the session. Last minute efforts to develop an acceptable legislative proposal concerned the issue of what farmland should be eligible for differential assessment. One proposal considered a single criterion—the proportion of income derived from farming. This proposal stated that operators who derive more than 50 percent of their income from farming should be considered bona fide farmers and their land eligible for differential assessment. While all landowners qualifying as bona fide farm operators would benefit from a reduction in their tax bills, others would probably pay higher taxes than without differential assessment legislation. Consequently, it is important to evaluate criteria used to designate bona fide farm operators.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1[ Barrows, R. L. and Bromley, D. W.. “Employment Impacts of the Economic Development Administration's Public Works Program,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 57, February 1975, pp. 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2[ Carlin, T. A. and Woods, W. F.. Tax Loss Farming, U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS-546, Washington, D.C., April 1974.Google Scholar
[3[ Clifton, I.D.Using the Automatic Interaction Detection (AID) Model to Obtain Homogeneous Classifications of Farmland Markets,” Agricultural Economics Research, Volume 27, July-October 1975, pp. 93100.Google Scholar
[4[ Hady, T. F. and Sibold, A. G.. State Programs for the Differential Assessment of Farm and Open Space Land, EDD, ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 256, Washington, D.C., April 1974.Google Scholar
[5[ Hady, T. F. and Stinson, T. F.. Taxation of Farmland on the Rural-Urban Fringe, ERS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 119, Washington, D.C., September 1967.Google Scholar
[6[ Lins, D. A. and Donaldson, T. R.. “Explaining Farmland Operator Debt: An Application of the Automatic Interaction Detector (AID) Technique,” Contributed Paper, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, August 15-18, 1976.Google Scholar
[7[ Logan, Charles A.Analysis of the Tax Burden for Commercial Farmers of Georgia,” Unpublished Thesis, University of Georgia, 1974.Google Scholar
[8[ Poole, A. T., Marshall, J. P. and Gibson, W. L.. Use-Value Assessment: A Study Based on Loudoun County, Virginia, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Research Division Bulletin 55, Blacksburg, Virginia, July 1970.Google Scholar
[9[ Sonquist, J. A., et. al. Searching for Structure, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1973.Google Scholar