Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:07:19.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fuel-Insulation Tradeoffs for Arkansas Broiler Houses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

William B. Riley Jr.
Affiliation:
St. Cloud State University, Minnesota
J. Martin Redfern
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas

Extract

Production of broilers requires very large quantities of heating energy. Optimum growth of broilers requires that the broiler house temperature be maintained within a narrow range. In Arkansas, chicks are normally started at a house temperature of 75°F with a 3°F per week reduction until a temperature of no less than 60° F is reached and maintained. Feed represents about sixty percent of total production cost, and most studies indicate that feed consumption increases rapidly as the temperature around the birds drops below 65° F. Most grower contracts contain an efficiency clause in which part of their payment depends on how efficient they are in converting feed to meat. They must maintain a certain minimum degree of efficiency to continue growing for their contractor. House temperatures can thus be lowered somewhat, but must be maintained within rather narrow limits for growers to continue to produce. This is mentioned to point out just how vulnerable growers are to rising fuel prices. Approximately 80 percent of Arkansas broiler growers use propane. The retail price of propane ranged from $0.18 to $0.41 per gallon in Arkansas from January 1973, to September 1977.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1[ Collins, N. E. and Walpole, E. W.. “Computer Simulation of Fuel Requirements for Growing Broilers,” Paper presented at the 1974 annual meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, June 7-15, 1974.Google Scholar
[2[ Hines, Douglas. “A Field Study of Fan Ventilated and Naturally Ventilated Poultry Houses,” M.S. thesis, University of Arkansas, 1973.Google Scholar
[3[ Ota, H., Whitehead, J. A. and Lillie, R. J.. “New Bioengineering Data for Designing Production Houses,” Paper presented at 1973 annual meeting of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, December 1973.Google Scholar
[4[ Riley, William R. Jr.An Economic Analysis of Heating Energy Consumption and Conservation in Contract Broiler Production in Arkansas,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arkansas, 1976.Google Scholar
[5[ Riley, William R. Jr. and Redfern, J. Martin. “Consumption and Conservation of Heating Energy in Contract Broiler Production in Arkansas,” Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 817, January 1977.Google Scholar
[6[ Rokeby, T. R. C. and Nelson, G. S.. “Controlled Ventilation for Broiler Houses,” Arkansas Farm Research X(5):8, September-October 1961.Google Scholar