Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:38:30.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Food and Agriculture in the 1980s: The Implied Research Priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

B. R. Eddleman
Affiliation:
National and Regional Research Planning, Evaluation, Analysis and Coordination (IR-6), State Agricultural Experiment Stations
Joseph C. Purcell
Affiliation:
Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station and the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station

Extract

Several factors arose during the post-World War II era and particularly the 1970-1980 decade which had a great impact on the U.S. food and agriculture system—including forestry, fiber, and related activities. They include (1) the increasing interdependence among the basic industries of agriculture and forestry and other sectors of the domestic and world economies, (2) the emergence of a technology highly dependent on petroleum and petrochemicals accompanied by increasing dependence of the U.S. on foreign sources of petroleum, the cartelization of major foreign crude oil suppliers under OPEC, and an increased vulnerability to worldwide political unrest, (3) the rapidly expanding export market for farm food and feed commodities and the reliance on farm commodity exports to help offset a growing deficit in international trade, (4) the rapid commercialization and industrialization of the food and agriculture sector, and (5) the increasing social awareness and demands for improved environmental quality and human health that led to public regulations affecting the food and agriculture system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breimyer, Harold F.A Look At Emerging Economic and Policy Issues Confronting Southern Agriculture in the 1980's.S. J. Agr. Econ. 11(1979):79.Google Scholar
Havlicek, Joseph Jr. and Capps, Oral Jr.Needed Research with Respect to Energy Use in Agricultural Economics.S. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1977):1-8.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. Gale. “Food Reserves and International Trade Policy,” ch. 11 in International Trade and Agriculture: Theory and Policy, Hillman, Jimmye S. and Schmitz, Andrew, eds. Boulder: Westview Press, Inc., 1979.Google Scholar
Lu, Yao-Chi, Cline, Phillip, and Quance, Leroy. “Prospects for Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture.” ESCS, USDA, Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 435, Sept. 1979.Google Scholar
Martin, James E.Agricultural Economics: A Critical Review of the State of the Science.S. J. Agr. Econ. 10(1978):3942.Google Scholar
Menzie, Elmer L.Agricultural Trade and Stabilization Policies,in Research Needs and Research Results in International Agricultural Trade, Hillman, Jimmye S., ed. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 237, March 1979, pp. 35.Google Scholar
Reimund, Donn A., Moore, Charles V., and Martin, J. Rod. “Factors Affecting Structural Change in Agricultural Subsectors: Implications for Research.S. J. Agr. Econ. 9(1977):1119.Google Scholar
Schuh, G. Edward. “The New Macroeconomics of Agriculture.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):802–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, G. Edward. “Problems Involved in Doing Research on International Trade in the Agricultural Sector,” ch. 12 in International Trade and Agriculture: Theory and Policy, Hillman, Jimmye S. and Schmitz, Andrew, eds. Boulder: Westview Press, Inc., 1979.Google Scholar
Schultz, Theodore W.Conflicts Over Changes in Scarcity: An Economic Approach.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 56(1974):9981004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorenson, Vernon L.Trade and Exchange Problems,in Research Needs and Research Results in International Agricultural Trade, Hillman, Jimmye S., ed. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 237, March 1979, pp. 57.Google Scholar
Webb, Kerry and Duncan, Marvin. “Energy Alternatives in the U.S. Crop Production.Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Feb. 1979, pp. 1422.Google Scholar