Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:41:34.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fire Protection Alternatives for Rural Areas*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

M. B. Badenhop  and
T. Morris Jones
M. B. Badenhop
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
T. Morris Jones
Affiliation:
Mobile College, Mobile, Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Studies show that populations of 10-12 thousand and more are needed before maximum savings in providing fire protection services to rural areas can be achieved. Yet, many rural areas have smaller, widely scattered populations, lax building codes and inadequate water supplies. Fire damage to rural property is three to six times greater per occurrence than for city property. Also, insurance costs are about six times greater on unprotected farm property than on protected. Data published for 1974 conditions indicate that all rural Tennessee counties and 45 percent of its municipalities were assigned Class 10, the lowest possible fire protection rating, denoting little or no fire fighting capability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , December 1977 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors express thanks to Dr. Brady J. Deaton for his input into the study. The paper is based on research conducted in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at the University of Tennessee.

References

[1[ Badenhop, M. B. and Jones, T. Morris. “Fire Protection Services for Rural Areas and Fire Insurance Coverage of Rural Properties in Tennessee,” Tennessee Farm and Home Science, Progress Report 92, October-December 1974, pp. 22–26.Google Scholar
[2[ Hirsch, Werner Z. “Expenditure Implications of Metropolitan Growth and Consolidation,” Review of Economics and Statistics, XLI, No. 3, August 1959, pp. 232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3[ Hirshleifer, J. Investment, Interest, and Capital, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970, p. 48.Google Scholar
[4[ Hitzhusen, Frederick J. “Some Policy Implications for Improved Measurement of Local Government Service Output and Costs: The Case of Fire Protection,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, September 1968.Google Scholar
[5[ Insurance Information Institute. Insurance Facts 1971, New York: Insurance Information Institute, 1971.Google Scholar
[6[ Jones, T. Morris. “Fire Protection Services for Rural Tennessee Communities: A Benefit-Cost Analysis,” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, December 1975.Google Scholar
[7[ Lederer, Thomas H. “Analysis of Cost and Supply for Fire Protection Services in the Smaller Municipalities and Rural Areas of Tennessee,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, March 1976.Google Scholar
[8[ United States Department of Agriculture. “Rural Fires—Prevent 'em or Fight 'em?” United States Extension Service and United States Forest Service, Washington: Government Printing Office, May 1969, p. 3.Google Scholar
[9[ Will, Robert E. “Scalar-Economics and Urban Service Requirements,” Yale Economic Essays, No. 5, Spring 1965.Google Scholar