Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T00:30:00.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of Public Sector Transaction Costs in NRCS Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Laura McCann  and
K. William Easter
Laura McCann
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia
K. William Easter
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When evaluating the economic efficiency of policies to reduce nonpoint source pollution, administrative or transaction costs are usually not taken into account. While the importance of transaction costs has been recognized in the theoretical literature, the fact that they are not incorporated in empirical analyses means that, in effect, these costs are given a zero value. This issue is examined quantitatively using data collected by the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). Transaction costs are found to be a significant portion (38 percent) of overall conservation costs. This provides strong support for including these costs in economic evaluations of alternative policy instruments.

Keywords

NRCStransaction costsnonpoint pollutionconservation practicesabatement costsenvironmental policy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 555 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coase, R.H. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica 4(1937):386–405.Google Scholar
Coase, R.H. “The Problem of Social Choice.” J. of Law and Econ 3(October 1960):1–44.Google Scholar
Fecso, B. Personal communication. Natural Resource Conservation Service, March 19, 1998.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.L.Regulation and Economic Analysis: A Critique over Two Centuries, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
Griffin, R.C., and Bromley, D.W.. “Agricultural Runoff as a Nonpoint Externality: A Theoretical Development.” Amer Agri J. Econ 64(August 1982):547–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, L., and Easter, K.W.. “Transaction Costs of Policies to Reduce Agricultural Phosphorus Pollution in the Minnesota River.” Land Economics 75(August 1999):402–14.Google Scholar
NRCS. America's Private Land: A Geography of Hope. USDA-NRCS, Program Aid 1548, 1996a.Google Scholar
NRCS. “Estimation of the Full Discovery Cost of a Conservation System on a Sampled Field.” Unpublished Staff Paper, 1996b.Google Scholar
North, D.C.Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Oates, W.E. “Markets and Externalities—Comment 1.” In Natural Resource Economics: Policy Problems and Contemporary Analysis, ed., Bromley, D.W.. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, 1986.Google Scholar
Stavins, R.N. “Transaction Costs and Tradeable Permits.” J. Environ. Econ. & Manage. 29 (2)(September 1995):133–48.Google Scholar
Stigler, G.J.The Theory of Price, 4th ed. Macmillan, New York. 1987.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.B. “Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Institutional Transaction Costs and the Regulation of Water Quality.” Natural Resources Journal 39(October 1999):517–41.Google Scholar
Wallis, J.J., and North, D.C.. “Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970.” In Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth, eds., Engerman, S.L. and Gallman, R.E.. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1986:95–148.Google Scholar
Williamson, O.E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar