Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:57:52.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Generic Advertising on the Demand for Fluid Milk: The Case of the Texas Market Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Oral Capps Jr  and
John D. Schmitz
Oral Capps Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
John D. Schmitz
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This analysis indicates that generic advertising expenditures, ceteris paribus, generated rightward shifts in demand for fluid milk in the Texas Market Order over the period January 1980 to September 1988. Generally, the results from this study are in agreement with previous research efforts which suggest that generic advertising can increase the demand for fluid milk. Importantly, in this analysis, the impacts of television and radio advertising have been effectively disentangled. Television advertising generates a response that wears off more quickly than radio advertising. Also, the long-run effect of radio advertising is about 1.75 times greater than the long-run effect of television advertising.

Keywords

generic advertisingfluid milkdistributed lag models
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , December 1991 , pp. 131 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Marketing Service. Dairy Market Statistics. Washington D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Various Issues, 1980–1985.Google Scholar
Basmann, R. “A Theory of Demand with Variable Consumer Preferences.” Econometrica, 24(1956): 17–58.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.G. “Econometric Measurement of the Duration of Advertising Effect on Sales.” J. Marketing Res., 13(1976):345–357.Google Scholar
Haidacher, R.C., Blaylock, J.R., and Myers, L.H.. Consumer Demand for Dairy Products. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, ERS Agr. Econ. R. No. 586, March 1988.Google Scholar
Hage, J., Associated Milk Producers Incorporated, Personal communication.Google Scholar
Jensen, H.H., Kesaven, T., and Johnson, S.R. “Measuring the Impact of Health Awareness on Dairy Demand” Journal Paper No. J-14518 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Iowa State University, June 1991.Google Scholar
Jones, J. and Weimer, J.. “A Survey of Health and Nutrition Related Food Choices.” National Food Review, 12(Fall 1980), United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H. “Demographic Versus Media Advertising Effects on Milk Demand: The Case of the New York City Market.” Northeast. J. Agr. Resource Econ., 15(1986):66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H. “Effect of Canadian Advertising on Milk Demand: The Case of the Buffalo, New York Market.” Can. J. Agr. Econ., 24(1987):181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnucan, H. and Forker, O.D.. “Seasonality in the Consumer Response to Milk Advertising with Implications for Milk Promotion Policy.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 68(1986):562–571.Google Scholar
Knutson, R.D., Hunter, C.A. Jr., and Schwart, R.B. Jr. The Texas Dairy Industry: Trends and Issues. Texas Agricultural Extension Service Publication No. B-1362, June 1981.Google Scholar
Knutson, R.D., Schwart, R., and Smith, E.G.. “Milk Self-Sufficiency: A Desirable Goal?” Food and Fiber Economics. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, 17 8(May 1988).Google Scholar
Liu, D.J. and Forker, O.D.. “Generic Fluid Milk Advertising, Demand Expansion and Supply Response: The Case of New York City.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70.2(1988):229–236.Google Scholar
Myers, L.H. “Research Needs and Future Directions in Advertising and Promotion Evaluation.” Dairy Product Demand Symposium, Atlanta GA, October 27-28,1987.Google Scholar
Nerlove, M. and Arrow, K.J.. “Optional Advertising Policy Under Dynamic Conditions.” Economica, 29 (1962):129–142.Google Scholar
Prato, A.A. “Milk Demand, Supply, and Price Relationships, 1950-1968.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 55(1973):217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwart, R.B. Jr. “Federal Milk Marketing Orders.” Dairy Fact Sheet. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Texas A&M University, L-2053, June 1988.Google Scholar
Seton, N.J. “Future Growth in the Texas Dairy Industry. M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M University, November 1985.Google Scholar
Simon, J.L. and Arndt, J.. “The Shape of the Advertising Response Function.” J. Advert. Res., 4(1980):11–28.Google Scholar
Texas Milk Market Report. Statistical Summary. Various issues. Carrollton TX, 1980–1988.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.R. and Eiler, D.A.. “Determinants of Milk Advertising Effectiveness.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 59.2(May 1977):330–335.Google Scholar
Thompson, S.R. and Eiler, D.A.. ”Producer Returns from Increased Milk Advertising.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 57.3(1975):505–508.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W. and Dixon, B.L.. “The Economic Impact of Fluid Milk Advertising on Milk Consumption.” National Dairy Promotion and Research Board, March 15, 1988.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W. and Dixon, B.L.. ”Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising Since the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 71.3(1989):730–739.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W. and McDonald, W.F.. “Effectiveness of Generic Milk Advertising: A Ten Region Study.” Agribusiness, 2(1986):77–89.Google Scholar
Ward, R.W., Chang, J., and Thompson, S.. “Commodity Advertising: Theoretical Issues Relating to Generic and Brand Promotions.” Agribusiness, 1.4(1985):269–276.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.R. and Thompson, R.G.. “Demand, Supply, and Price Relationships for the Dairy Sector, Post-World War II Period.” J. Farm Econ., 49(1967):360–371.Google Scholar