Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:29:45.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Analysis of Environmental Benefits of Integrated Pest Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jeffrey D. Mullen ,
George W. Norton  and
Dixie W. Reaves
Jeffrey D. Mullen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech
George W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech
Dixie W. Reaves
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public support for integrated pest management (IPM) is derived in part from concerns over food safety and the environment, yet few studies have assessed the economic value of health and environmental benefits of IPM. An approach is suggested for such an assessment and applied to the Virginia peanut IPM program. Effects of IPM on environmental risks posed by pesticides are assessed and society's willingness to pay to reduce those risks is estimated. The annual environmental benefits of the peanut IPM program are estimated at $844,000. The estimates of pesticide risks and willingness to pay can be applied elsewhere in economic assessments of IPM.

Keywords

environmental benefitsintegrated pest managementwillingness to pay
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , December 1997 , pp. 243 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antle, J.M., and Pingali, P.L.. “Pesticides, Productivity, and Farmer Health: A Philippine Case Study.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 76(August 1994):418-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K., et al. “Report of the NO A A Panel on Contingent Valuation.” National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington DC, January 1993.Google Scholar
Becker, R.L., Herzfeld, D., Ostlie, K.R., and Stamm, E.J.-Katovich. “Pesticides: Surface Runoff, Leaching, and Exposure Concerns.” Bull. No. AG-BU-3911, Minnesota Ext. Ser., Minneapolis, 1989.Google Scholar
Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F.R., Dunford, R.W., Hudson, S.P., and Wilson, K.N.. “Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability.” In Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, ed., Hausman, J.A.. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1993.Google Scholar
EXTOXNET. [Multi-university computer network providing toxicity-related electronic data; database available on Oregon State server.] Online. Available at http://sulaco.oes.orst.edu:/70/1/ext/extoxnet.Google Scholar
Ferguson, W., and Yee, J.. “Evaluation of Professional Scouting Programs in Cotton Production.” J. Econ. Entomology 6(January-March 1993):100-03.Google Scholar
Gustafson, D.I. “Groundwater Ubiquity Score: A Simple Method for Assessing Pesticide Leach-ability.” Environ. Toxicology and Chem. 8(1989):339-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanemann, W.M. “Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation.” J. Econ. Perspectives 8(Fall 1994):19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, D., and Kidd, H., eds. The Agrochemical Handbook, 2nd ed. Nottingham, England: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1987.Google Scholar
Hatcher, J.E., Wetzstein, M.E., and Douce, G.K.. “An Economic Evaluation of Integrated Pest Management for Cotton, Peanuts, and Soybeans in Georgia.” Res. Bull. No. 318, Georgia Exp. Sta., University of Georgia, Athens, 1984.Google Scholar
Higley, L.G., and Wintersteen, W.K.. “A Novel Approach to Environmental Risk Assessment of Pesticides as a Basis for Incorporating Environmental Costs into Economic Injury Levels.” Amer. Entomologist 38(Spring 1992):34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingsworth, C.S., Coli, W.M., Cooley, D.R., and Prokopy, R.J.. “Massachusetts Integrated Pest Management Guidelines for Apples.” Fruit Notes (Fall 1992):12–16.Google Scholar
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J.. “A Method to Measure the Environmental Impact of Pesticides.” In New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, No. 139. New York State Agr. Exp. Sta., Cornell University, Ithaca, 1992.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.C., and Carson, R.T.. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1989.Google Scholar
Phipps, P.H. “IPM in Peanuts: Developing and Delivering Working IPM Systems.” Plant Disease 77(March 1993):307-09.Google Scholar
Portney, P.R. “The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care.” J. Econ. Perspectives 8(Fall 1994):3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajotte, E.G., Kazmierczak, R.F. Jr., Norton, G.W., Lambur, M.T., and Allen, W.A.. The National Evaluation of Extension's Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Programs. Pub. No. 491-010, Virginia Coop. Ext. Ser., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1987.Google Scholar
Rola, A.C., and Pingali, P.L.. “Pesticides, Rice Productivity, and Farmers' Health: An Economic Assessment.” International Rice Research Institute and World Resources Institute, Manila, 1993.Google Scholar
Smith, G.J. “Toxicology and Pesticide Use in Relation to Wildlife: Organophosphorous and Carbamate Compounds.” U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC, 1993.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Reregis-tration Eligibility Decision (RED): Maleic Hydrazide.” EPA Pub. No. 738-R-94-010 [and several similar re-registration documents], Washington DC, June 1984.Google Scholar
Wauchope, R.D., Buttler, T.M., Hornsby, A.G., Beckers, P.W.M., and Burt, J.P.. “The SCS/ARS/CES Pesticide Properties Database for Environmental Decisionmaking.” Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Vol. 123, ed., Ware, G.W.. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G.B., and Thompson, P.. “The Economic Feasibility of Tree Fruit Integrated Pest Management in the Northeast.” J. Northeastern Agr. Econ. Council 11(Fall 1982):39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthington, C.R., ed. The Pesticide Manual: A World Compendium, 8th ed. British Crop Protection Council. Suffolk, UK: The Lavenham Press, Ltd., 1987.Google Scholar