Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:29:53.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Close Count? School Proximity, School Quality, and Residential Property Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kwame Owusu-Edusei Jr. ,
Molly Espey  and
Huiyan Lin
Kwame Owusu-Edusei Jr.
Affiliation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Atlanta, GA
Molly Espey
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Huiyan Lin
Affiliation:
Capital One
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study jointly estimates the impact of school quality and school proximity on residential property values in Greenville, South Carolina. While quality is found to be capitalized into residential property values, the degree of capitalization depends on school level and proximity to each school for which the house is zoned for attendance. In general, there is positive value associated with closer proximity to schools of all levels, and negative value associated with a significantly longer than average distance to schools. In terms of quality rankings, excellence at the elementary and high school levels has the strongest impact on property values.

Keywords

hedonicspark proximityschool proximityschool quality121018R21
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 211 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., and McMillan, R.. “A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods.” Economic Growth Center: Discussion Paper No. 872. 2003.Google Scholar
Black, S.E. “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(i2 1999):577–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, D.M. “Which Measures of School Quality Does the Housing Market Value?” Journal of Real Estate Research 18(1999):395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasington, D.M., and Haurin, D.R.. “Educational Outcomes and House Values: A Test of the Value Added Approach.” Journal of Regional Science 46(2006):245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapp, J.M., Nanda, A., and Ross, S.L.. “Test-Scores and Demographics: What Premiums Do They Attract in Property Values? A Panel Data Analysis.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, 2004.Google Scholar
Dills, A.K. “Do Parents Value Changes in Test Scores? High Stakes Testing in Texas.” Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 3(2004): Article 10.Google Scholar
Downes, T.A., and Zabel, J.E.. “The Impact of School Characteristics on House Prices: Chicago 1987-1991.” Journal of Urban Economics 52(2002):1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edel, M., and Sciar, E.. “Taxes, Spending, and Property Values: Supply Adjustment in a Tieb-out-Oates Model.” Journal of Political Economy 82(1974):941–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espey, M., and Owusu-Edusei, K.. “Neighborhood Parks and Residential Property Values in Greenville, South Carolina.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33,3(2001):487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, D.N., and Lucas, M.E.. “What's In a Grade? School Report Cards and the Housing Market.” American Economic Review 94(2004):591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grether, D.M., and Mieszkowski, P.. “Determinants of Real Estate Values.” Journal of Urban Economics 1(1974):127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustely, R.D. “Local Taxes, Expenditures, and Urban Housing: A Reassessment of the Evidence.” Southern Economic Journal 42(1976):659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. Jr, and Rubinfeld, D.L.. “Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 5(1978):81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haurin, D.R., and Brasington, D.. “School Quality and Real House Prices: Interjurisdictional Effects.” Journal of Housing Economics 5(1996):351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, K.J., and Taylor, L.L.. “Neighborhood School Characteristics: What Signals Quality to Homebuyers?” Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review 3(1996):2–9.Google Scholar
Kane, T.R., Staiger, D.O., and Samms, G.. “School Accountability Ratings and Housing Values.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (2003):83–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W.E. “The Effects of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis.” Journal of Political Economy 77(1969):957–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, J., and Somerville, T.. “School Quality and Residential Property Values: Evidence from Vancouver Rezoning.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, 2004.Google Scholar
Rosen, H.S., and Fullerton, D.J.. “A Note on Local Tax Rates, Public Benefit Levels, and Property Values.” Journal of Political Economy 85(1977):433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonstelie, J.C., and Portney, P.R.. “Gross Rents and Market Values: Testing the Implications of Tiebout's Hypothesis.” Journal of Urban Economics 7(1980):102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar