Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:03:28.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: The Incidence, Nature, and Implications of Price-Fixing Litigation in U.S. Food Industries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

H. M. Harris Jr.*
Affiliation:
Clemson University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bowman, Ward S.Restraint of Trade by the Supreme Court: The Utah Pie Case,” Yale Law Journal, Volume 77, pg. 70, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Elzinga, Kenneth G. and Hogarty, Thomas F.. “Utah Pie and the Consequences of Robinson Patman,” unpublished manuscript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Harris, H. M. Jr., Knutson, R. D., and French, C. E.. “An Economics Analysis of Policies Protecting Small Business in the Milk Industry,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 5, December 1973.Google Scholar
[4]National Commission on Food Marketing. Special Studies in Food Marketing, Technical Study Number 10, June 1966.Google Scholar
[5]Parker, Russell C.Antitrust Issues in the Food Industries,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 58, December 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] U. S. vs. Aluminum Company of America, 148 F. 2nd 416 (2nd. Cir.), 1945.Google Scholar
[7] U. S. vs. U. S. Gypsum Company, 550 F. 2nd. 115, 1977.Google Scholar
[8] Utah Pie Company vs. Continental Baking Company, 386 U. S. 685,1967.Google Scholar