Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:59:39.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion: Implications of Emerging Biotechnologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jack McEowen*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Invited Papers and Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bull, Alan T., Holt, Geoffrey, Lilly, Malcolm D.. Biotechnology: International Trends and Perspectives. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1982, pp. 2638.Google Scholar
Hopkin, John A.Discussion: Moral Responsibility and Agricultural Research.So. J. Agr. Econ. 15 (July):8182.Google Scholar
Mapletoft, Reuben J.Embryo Transfer Technology for the Enhancement of Animal Reproduction.Biotechnology, 2(1984), pp. 149160.Google Scholar
McEowen, Jack. “A Plan to Encourage and Facilitate Long Term Industrial Funding of Research Within the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.” Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, 1983, p. 3.Google Scholar
Saliwanchik, Roman. Legal Protection for Microbiological and Genetic Engineering Inventions. Reading, Massachusettes: Addison-Wesley, 1982, pp. 3105.Google Scholar
Smith, G. E., Summers, M. D., Fraser, M. J.. “Production of Human Beta Interferon in Insect Cells Infected with a Baculovirus Expression Vector.Molecular and Cellular Biology, 3(1983), pp. 21562165.Google ScholarPubMed