Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:54:14.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining the Economic Feasibility of Public Recreational Developments at Beaver Lake, Arkansas*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Robert N. Shulstad  and
Thomas G. Sawyer
Robert N. Shulstad
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Arkansas
Thomas G. Sawyer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Arkansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Beaver Lake is nestled in the midst of the Ozark Mountains in the northwest corner of Arkansas. The picturesque lake is actually a multi-purpose reservoir constructed and maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The 28,220 acre lake offers eleven improved public access areas for use by recreationists. Six additional recreational areas have been planned, to be built as demand requires [16].

Costs for development of the six additional parks were estimated by the Corps of Engineers as of July 1974, to be $6.87 million [16].

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , July 1977 , pp. 101 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association, Atlanta, Georgia, February 7-9, 1977. Published with the approval of Director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station

References

[1]Brown, William G. and Nawas, Farid. “Impact of Aggregation on the Estimation of Outdoor Recreation Demand Functions,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55, 246-59, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brown, William G., Nawas, Farid H. and Stevens, Joe B.. The Oregon Big Game Resource: An Economic Evaluation, Corvallis: Oregon State University, Special Report 379,1973.Google Scholar
[3]Brown, William G., Singh, Ajmer and Castle, Emery N.. An Economic Evaluation of the Oregon Salmon and Steelhead Sport Fishery, Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[4]Christenson, James A.A Procedure for Conducting Mail Surveys with the General Public, Raleigh: North Carolina State University, 1974.Google Scholar
[5]Edwards, J. A., Gibbs, K. C., Guedry, L. J. and Stoevener, H. H.. “The Demand for Non-Unique Outdoor Recreational Services: Methodological Issues,” Technical Bulletin 133, Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, May 1976.Google Scholar
[6]Gibbs, Kenneth Charles. The Estimation of Recreational Benefits Resulting from an Improvement of Water Quality in Upper Klamath Lake: An Application of a Method for Evaluation the Demand for Outdoor Recreation, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, Inc. 1969.Google Scholar
[7]Gibbs, Kenneth Charles and McGuire, John F. III. “Estimation of Outdoor Recreational Values,” Gainesville: Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Economic Report 53, 1973.Google Scholar
[8]Guedry, Leo Joseph Jr.The Role of Selected Population and Site Characteristics in the Demand for Forest Recreation, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, Inc., 1970.Google Scholar
[9]Gum, Russell L. and Martin, William E.. “Problems and Solutions in Estimating the Demand for and Value of Rural Outdoor Recreation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, November 1975.Google Scholar
[10]Martin, William E., Gum, Russell L. and Smith, Arthur H.. “The Demand for and Value of Hunting, Fishing and General Rural Outdoor Recreation in Arizona,” Tuscon: Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 211, 1974.Google Scholar
[11]Pindyck, Robert S. and Rubinfield, Daniel L.. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
[12]Stevens, Joe Bruce. A Study of Conflict in Natural Resource Use: Evaluation of Recreational Benefits as Related to Changes in Water Quality, Ann Arbor: University Microfilms, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[13]U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Monthly Recreational Visitation Data, Project—Beaver Lake, Little Rock: Southwestern Division, Corps of Engineers, 1973.Google Scholar
[14]U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Monthly Recreational Visitation Data, Project—Beaver Lake, Little Rock: Southwestern Division, Corps of Engineers, 1974.Google Scholar
[15]U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Draft-Operation and Maintenance Environmental Statement—Beaver Lake, Arkansas, Little Rock: Southwestern Division, Corps of Engineers, 1974.Google Scholar
[16]U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Updated Master Plan for Beaver Lake, July 1975, Little Rock: Southwestern Division, Corps of Engineers, 1975.Google Scholar