Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T11:52:50.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining Optimal Replacement Age of Beef Cows in the Presence of Stochastic Elements*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Ernest Bentley ,
James R. Waters  and
C. Richard Shumway
Ernest Bentley
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
James R. Waters
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, North Carolina State University
C. Richard Shumway
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Feeder calf producers face a problem common to all owners of productive assets: how long should the asset (brood cow) be used before it is replaced? Expected productivity of a brood cow can be measured by two parameters: (1) the likelihood that she will wean a calf, and (2) its anticipated weight when weaned. Both are independent functions of the cow's age which decline annually after reaching peaks in the early years of her productive life. The calf producer who expects to maximize profits in the long run must choose an optimal rate of replacement for his brood cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1976 , pp. 13 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Technical Article No. 12705 of the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

[1] Burt, Oscar R. “Optimal Replacement Under Risk,” Journal of Farm Economics, 47:324–345, May 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University. Unpublished Data on 370 Beef Cows, 1963-1974, Umstead Hospital, Butner, North Carolina.Google Scholar
[3] Faris, J. Edwin. “Analytical Techniques Used in Determining the Optimal Replacement Pattern,” Journal of Farm Economics, 42:755–766, November 1960.Google Scholar
[4] Maddox, L.A. Jr.Nutrient Requirements of the Cow and Calf, Texas Agricultural Extension Service Bulletin 1044, April 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Nelson, Kenneth E. and Purcell, Wayne D.. “A Quantitative Approach to the Feedlot Replacement Decision,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 3:143–149, July 1972.Google Scholar
[6] Perrin, R. K. “Asset Replacement Principles,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54:60–67, February 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Rogers, LeRoy Jr. “Economics of Replacement Rates in Commercial Beef Herds,” Journal of Animal Science, 34(6):921–925, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Rogers, LeRoy Jr. “Replacement Decisions for Commercial Beef Herds,” Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 736, 1971.Google Scholar
[9] Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Texas Crop Budgets: Blacklands Region, Texas A&M University, MP-1027, April 1975.Google Scholar
[10] Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Texas Livestock Budgets, Texas A&M University, April 1975.Google Scholar
[11] USDA. Agricultural Statistics, Washington, 1975.Google Scholar
[12]. USDA, AMS. “Annual Livestock Detailed Quotations, San Antonio Market, 1955-1974,” Unpublished Data.Google Scholar
[13] USDA, Extension Service. Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs, Program Aid 1020, Washington, 1972.Google Scholar
[14] U.S. Meat Animal Research Center. “Palpation Summary, Spring Breeding,” Clay Center, Nebraska, Unpublished Data, 1975.Google Scholar