Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:55:14.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civic Community Approaches to Rural Development in the South: Economic Growth with Prosperity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Kenneth L. Robinson ,
Thomas A. Lyson  and
Ralph D. Christy
Kenneth L. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Thomas A. Lyson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Ralph D. Christy
Affiliation:
Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The free market-based policies of the corporate community model have skewed economic development across the South. For many small, rural communities, the consequences of global capitalism have resulted in declining real wages, high underemployment, and increasing rates of income inequality. Backed by recent scholarship and grassroots movements that suggest that both civic engagement and the presence of smaller-scale, locally controlled enterprises can help determine whether communities prosper or decline, this paper explores the links between social structure and rural development in the South. The goal is to expand our understanding of civic community theory as an alternative to the neoclassical economic model of development. Using a local problem-solving framework, we suggest that a departure from the traditional, neoclassical path of development is in order. We conclude that rural policy makers must establish a role for civic community in the rural development process if they wish to protect the welfare of workers and communities, while increasing the prospects of economic growth with prosperity.

Keywords

civic communityeconomic growthrural developmentsocial capitalSouthern United StatesR11021R58
Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , August 2002 , pp. 327 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Averitt, R.T.The Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industry Structure. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
Barber, B.R.Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Times Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Beck, E.M., Horan, P.M., and Tolbert, C.M.. “Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination.” American Sociological Review 43(1978):704-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. “Conserving Communities.” The Case Against the Global Economy. Mander, J. and Goldsmith, E., eds., pp. 407-18. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Bluestone, B., and Harrison, B.. The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books, 1982.Google Scholar
Caudill, H.M.Night Comes to the Cumberlands. Boston: Little, Brown, 1963.Google Scholar
Christy, R.D., Dassie, W., and Wenner, M.. Entrepreneurship-Centered Economic Development: An Analysis of African American Entrepreneurship in the Southern Black Belt. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 1998.Google Scholar
Doeringer, P.B., and Piore, M.J.. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1971.Google Scholar
Falk, W.W., and Lyson, T.A.. High Tech, Low Tech, No Tech: Recent Occupational and Industrial Changes in the South. Albany, NY: SUNY-Albany Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Falk, W.W., Talley, C.R., and Rankin, B.H.. “Life in the Unforgotten South: The Black Belt.” Forgotten Places: Uneven Development in Rural America. Lyson, T.A. and Falk, W.W., eds., pp. 53–75. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1993.Google Scholar
Fasenfest, D. “Cui Bono?” Grand Designs. Craypo, C. and Nissen, B., eds., pp. 119-37. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F.The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order. New York: Free Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J.K.The New Industrial State. New York: Signet, 1967.Google Scholar
Goldhamer, H. “Voluntary Associations in the United States.” Cities and Society. Hatt, Paul K. and Reiss, Albert J. Jr., eds., pp. 591-96. New York: The Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, W. “Small Business and the Community.” Report of the Smaller War Plants Corporation to the Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J.H. “The End of Convergence: Corporatist and Dualist Tendencies in Modern Western Societies.” Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Goldthorpe, J.H., ed., pp. 315-43. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Grant, D.S. II. “The Political Economy of Business Failures Across the American States, 1970-1985: The Impact of Reagan's New Federalism.” American Sociological Review 60(1995):851-73.Google Scholar
Harrison, B.Lean and Mean. New York: Basic Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Herbert-Cheshire, L. “Contemporary Strategies for Rural Community Development in Australia: A Governmentality Perspective.” Journal of Rural Studies 16(2000):203-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, R.Workers' Earnings and Corporate Economic Structure. New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Irwin, M., Tolbert, C., and Lyson, T.. “How to Build Strong Towns.” American Demographics 19(1997):42-7.Google Scholar
Kerr, C.Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Lobao, L.Locality and Inequality. Albany, NY: SUNY-Albany Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Lyson, T.A.Two Sides to the Sunbelt: The Growing Divergence Between the Rural and Urban South. New York: Praeger, 1989.Google Scholar
Lyson, T.A. “Down and Out in Rural America: The Status of Blacks and Hispanics in the 1980s.” Investing in People: The Human Capital Needs of Rural America. Beaulieu, L.J. and Mulkey, D., eds., pp. 167-82. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Lyson, T.A. “Global Capital and the Transformation of Rural Communities.” Handbook of Rural Studies. Marsden, T., Cloke, P., and Mooney, P., eds. London: Sage Publications, in press.Google Scholar
Lyson, T.A., and Young, F.W.. “Structural Pluralism and Economic Well-Being.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, n.d.Google Scholar
Mander, J., and Goldsmith, E., eds. The Case Against the Global Economy. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books, 1996.Google Scholar
McMichael, P. “Globalization: Myths and Realities.” Rural Sociology 61(1996a):25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, P.Development and Social Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 1996b.Google Scholar
Mills, C.W., and Ulmer, M.. “Small Business and Civic Welfare.” Report of the Smaller War Plants Corporation to the Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business. Document 135, U.S. Senate, 79th Congress, 2nd session, February 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946.Google Scholar
Mohan, G. “Dislocating Globalization.” Geography 85(2000):121-33.Google Scholar
Piore, M.J., and Sabel, C.F.. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
Portes, A., and Landolt, P.. “The Downside of Social Capital.” The American Prospect 26(1996)18–21, 94.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.M.Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.M. “Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(1995):65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K.L. “Sunset Over the Sunbelt: An Empirical Analysis of Two Alternative Theories of Development in the Southern United States.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 2001.Google Scholar
Sengenberger, W., and Pyke, F., eds. Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Schmid, A.A., and Robison, L.J.. “Applications of Social Capital Theory.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(1995):59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolzenberg, R.M. “Bringing the Boss Back In: Employer Size, Schooling, and Socioeconomic Achievement.” American Sociological Review 43(1978):813-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurow, L.G.The Future of Capitalism. New York: W. Morrow, 1996.Google Scholar
Tigges, L.M.Changing Fortunes. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar
Tolbert, C.M., Lyson, T.A., and Irwin, M.. “Local Capitalism, Civic Engagement, and Socioeconomic Welfare.” Social Forces 77(1998):401-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress. “Corporate Restructuring and Downsizing.” Hearings Before the Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives, 104th Congress, first session, March 23. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995.Google Scholar
Wall, E., Ferrazzi, G., and Schryer, F.. “Getting the Goods on Social Capital.” Rural Sociology 63(1998):300-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D.. “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” World Bank Observer. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.Google Scholar
Young, F.W.Small Towns in Multilevel Society. New York: University Press of America, 1999.Google Scholar