Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:26:56.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Beef Cow-Calf Enterprise in the Georgia Piedmont: A Case Study in Conspicuous Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Wesley N. Musser ,
Neil R. Martin Jr.  and
James O. Wise
Wesley N. Musser
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA
Neil R. Martin Jr.
Affiliation:
Commodity Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA
James O. Wise
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Economists have demonstrated considerable concern with the appropriateness of profit maximization as a sole firm objective. Agricultural economists have adopted suggestions of economic theorists in writings on production economics; for example, Heady relaxed the objective of profit maximization to incorporate preferences for family consumption and risk aversion. Production economics research has supported the theoretical reasoning for multiple firm objectives; in a recent article, Lin, Dean, and Moore state “… empirical studies explicitly employing the profit maximization hypothesis … have generally provided results inconsistent with observed or plausible behavior”. Previous studies incorporating multiple objectives in analysis of agricultural production have largely been concerned with the general theoretical categories suggested by Heady. Lin, Dean, and Moore considered profit maximization and risk aversion. Patrick and Eisgruber considered accumulation of net worth, annual net income for consumption, leisure, and risk-taking; Hatch, Harmon, and Eidman included eight similar goals in their analysis. These studies have followed the tradition in micro-economic theory of separate production and consumption decision-making. While previous analyses have departed from the perfect knowledge, static basis of conventional micro-economics, the major interaction between production and consumption decisions concerns the level and variability of income available for consumption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , July 1975 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Allison, John R. Beef Production in Georgia Resources Used and Operator Characteristics, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 131, February 1974.Google Scholar
[2] Allison, John R. Unpublished Survey Data, Regional Research Project S-67, Department of Agricultural Economics, Experiment, Georgia, 1969.Google Scholar
[3] Cho-Chung-Hing, Alfred B. Minimum Resource Requirements for Beef and General Crop-Livestock Farms for Specified Levels of Farm Incomes, Piedmont Area of Georgia—Full and Part-Time Farming Situations, Unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia, 1974.Google Scholar
[4] Cohen, Kalman J., and Cyert, Richard M.. Theory of the Firm: Resource Allocation in a Market Economy, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965.Google Scholar
[5] Ely, Richard T., and Wehrwein, George S.. Land Economics, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1940.Google Scholar
[6] Hatch, Roy E., et. al. Incorporating Multiple Goals into the Decision-Making Process: A Simulation Approach to Firm Growth Analysis,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 6:1, July 1974.Google Scholar
[7] Hatch, Roy E., et. al. Aggregate Farm Production and Returns Under Alternative Cotton Prices and Allotments, Gulf Coast Prairie of Texas, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station MP-818, October, 1966.Google Scholar
[8] Heady, Earl O. Economics of Agricultural Production and Resource Use, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1952.Google Scholar
[9] Henderson, James M., and Quandt, Richard E.. Microeconomic Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1958.Google Scholar
[10] Laughlin, Robert E., et. al. An Economic Analysis of Alternative Beef Cattle Systems for a Large Farm in Central Missouri, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Research Bulletin 895, September, 1965.Google Scholar
[11] Lin, William, et. al. “An Empirical Test of Utility vs Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56:3, August 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] McGuire, Joseph W. Theories of Business Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964.Google Scholar
[13] Mundlak, Yair. “Maximization with Several Objective Functions,” Proceedings of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, 1970.Google Scholar
[14] Patrick, George F. and Eisgruber, Ludwig M.. “The Impact of Managerial Ability and Capital Structure on Growth of the Farm Firm,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 50:3, August 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Rogers, Everett M. Social Change in Rural Society, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1960.Google Scholar
[16] Skold, M. D., and Epp, A. W.. Optimal Farm Organization for Irrigated Farms in South Central Nebraska, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 222, February 1966.Google Scholar
[17] Southern Cooperative Series. Resource Use Adjustments in Southern Rice Areas, Bulletin 122, June 1967.Google Scholar
[18] U.S. Bureau of the Census. U.S. Census of Agriculture: 1954, Vol. I, Counties and State Economic Areas, Part 17, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1956.Google Scholar
[19] U.S. Bureau of Census. U.S. Census of Population: 1910, Vol. VI, Agriculture, 1909 and 1910, Reports by States, with Statistics for Counties, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1913.Google Scholar
[20] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Farm Income State Estimates 1949-73, FIS 224 Supplement, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., September 1974.Google Scholar
[21] Van Arsdall, Roy N. and Elder, William A.. Economies of Size of Illinois Cash Grain and Hog Farms, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 733, February 1969.Google Scholar
[22] Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: New American Library, Inc., 1953.Google Scholar
[23] Wise, James O. Selected Crop and Livestock Budgets for the Piedmont Area of Georgia, Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 188, July 1974.Google Scholar
[24] Zimmermann, Erich W. World Resources and Industries, Revised Edition, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1951.Google Scholar