Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:06:16.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of the Transhipment Model to Development of the Seed Industry in Northeast Brazil*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Fred H. Tyner  and
Roberto G. Campos
Fred H. Tyner
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University
Roberto G. Campos
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, is presently with the State Commission for Agricultural Planning, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The importance of agriculture in developing economies is reflected in the share of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) originating in that sector and in the percent of population working in that sector. Brazil received 19 percent of its GDP from agriculture in 1968, and 60 percent of its population was in agriculture. In contrast, only three percent of GDP came from agriculture in the United States, and only six percent of the population was employed in agriculture.

Development of a country's agriculture is dependent on a multitude of factors—not the least of which is availability and use of good seed. Use of high quality seeds increases total yield; allows for more efficient use of fertilizers, pesticides and irrigation because of greater uniformity, better stands and more vigorous plants; usually results in higher quality produce; requires lower planting rates; and usually reduces weed, disease and soil insect problems. Other inputs such as fertilizers, pesticides, technical assistance and credit availability are necessary to achieving a sound agriculture.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , December 1976 , pp. 109 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This report was developed from “Optimum Number, Size, and Location of Seed Processing Facilities in the States of Paraiba, Pernambuco, and Alagoas in Northeast Brazil,” by Roberto Gilson da Costa Campos, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Mississippi State University, August 1975. Journal Series No. 3174 of the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State.

References

[1] Banco do Nordeste do Brazil. “Perspectivas de Desenvolimento do Nordeste ate’ 1980,” Volumes 1 and 2, Brazil, 1971.Google Scholar
[2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. “The State of Food and Agriculture,” FAO, Rome, 1972.Google Scholar
[3] Hurt, Verner G., and Tramel, Thomas E.. “Alternative Formulation of the Transhipment Problem,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 47, pp. 763–773, August 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] King, Gordon A. and Logan, Samuel H.. “Optimum Location, Number, and Size of Processing Plants With Raw Product and Final Product Shipments,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 46, pp. 94–108, February 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Kriebel, Charles H. “Warehousing With Transhipment Under Seasonal Demand,” Journal of Regional Science, Volume 3, pp. 57–69, Summer 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Mathia, Gene A. “Selection of the Optimum Number, Size and Location of Processing Plants,” Paper presented at Association of Southern Agricultural Workers, Memphis, Tennessee, February 4,1963.Google Scholar
[7] Ministerio da Agricultura. “Estudos Sobre a viabilidade da Elaboracao do Projeto de apoio tecnicoeconomico para Implantacao do Piano Nacional de Semetes na Regiao Nordeste,” Brazil, DEPA-PE, 1972.Google Scholar
[8] Ministerio da Agricultura. “Programa de Semetes do Nordeste,” Unpublished Report, Brazil, 1973.Google Scholar
[9] Olson, Fred L. “Location Theory as Applied to Milk Processing Plants,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 41, pp. 1546–1556, December 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Polopolus, Leo. “Optimum Plant Numbers and Locations for Multiple Product Processing,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 47, pp. 287–295, May 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Rostran, A. “Economic Efficiency in Seed Processing Facilities,” Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, 1974.Google Scholar
[12] Stennis, Earl A. and Hurt, Verner G.. “A Negative-Cost Approach to the Formulation of Transhipment Problems,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 7, No. 1, pp. 165–170, July 1975.Google Scholar
[13] Stollsteimer, John F. “A Working Model for Plant Number and Locations,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 45, pp. 631–645, August 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Williamson, J.C Jr. “The Equilibrium Size of Marketing Plants in a Spatial Market,” Journal of Farm Economics, Volume 44, pp. 953–967, November 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar