Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:58:01.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Econometric Model of Manufacturing Employment Growth in Rural Tennessee Counties from 1962 to 1976

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Dale J. Leuck*
Affiliation:
The University of Tennessee Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Department

Extract

Modeling local and regional manufacturing activity is an important component of economic research. Models that explain the levels of local aggregates, such as employment, aid the efforts of state and local governments to influence the future course of economic activity. Such models also aid private decision makers in their efforts to develop feasibility studies of projects representing different investment alternatives. Input-output and economic base studies are the most common means of modeling local economic activity. These studies, though useful in assessing the multiplier effects of changes in local manufacturing activity, do not capture the temporal influence of national economic trends or the specific community characteristics responsible for varying levels of manufacturing activity. Econometric models, being more flexible and less expensive, may better serve the latter purposes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Dorf, Ronald J. and Jarvin Emerson, M.. “Determinants of Manufacturing Plant Location for Non-Metropolitan Communities in the West-North Central Region of the U.S.,” Journal of Regional Science, Volume 18, No. 1, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Glickman, Norman J.An Econometric Forecasting Model of the Philadelphia Region,” Journal of Regional Science, Volume 11, No. 1, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gorsuch, Richard L.Factor Analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1974.Google Scholar
[4]Gunter, Danny Lloyd. “Factors Affecting Employment Patterns in Plants in Rural Tennessee 1964–73,” unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, December 1975.Google Scholar
[5]Nicholls, William H.Industrialization, Factor Markets, and Agricultural Development,” Journal of Political Economy, Volume 69, No. 4, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Schultz, T. W.Investment in Human Capital. New York: The Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
[7]Smith, David M.Industrial Location: An Economic Geographical Analysis, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971.Google Scholar
[8]Smith, Eldon D., Deaton, Brady J., and Kelch, David R.. “Location Determinants of Manufacturing Industry in Rural Areas,” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume 10, July 1978.Google Scholar