Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:13:20.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

America's Forgotten People and Places: Ending the Legacy of Poverty in the Rural South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Joyce E. Allen-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Ronald C. Wimberley
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Libby V. Morris
Affiliation:
Institute of Higher Education, University of Georgia

Abstract

This study focuses on the longstanding impoverishment of the rural South and three of its subregions-Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta, and the Black Belt. The poor quality of life in rural Appalachia and along the Mississippi Delta has been publically acknowledged by programs and commissions for improving conditions. However, the more comprehensive Black Belt subregion that links parts of Southern Appalachia and the Southern Delta has not received such regional policy attention. While the South as a whole is more rural and impoverished than other U.S. regions, this is largely due to the poor conditions in the Black Belt. In addition to region and rurality, a third feature of the pattern is race. It is in the Black Belt that the South's poor socioeconomic conditions are most concentrated. Policy and program attention are needed for regional solutions that take rurality and race into account along with demographic and other subregional characteristics.

Type
Invited Paper Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J.E. and Thompson, A.. “Rural Poverty among Racial and Ethnic Minorities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (Dec. 1990):11611168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen-Smith, J.E. and Appiah, E.. “Determinants of Geographic Poverty: Evidence from Illinois.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Toronto, Canada, July 27-30, 1997. Appalachian Regional Commission. URL:http://www.arc.govGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, D.L. and Parks, A.L.. “Economic Development in Southern Black Belt Counties: How Does It Measure Up?” in Stewart, J. and Allen-Smith, J.E. (editors), Blacks in Rural America: New Brunswick, Transactions Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Billings, D. and Tickamyer, A.. “Uneven Development in Appalachia.” in Lyson, T.A. and Falk, W.W. (editors), Forgotten Places: Uneven Development in Rural America. (Lawrence): University Press of Kansas, 1993.Google Scholar
Cushing, B. and Rogers, C.. “Income and Poverty” in Socio-Economic Review of Appalachia.Google Scholar
Deavers, K.Rural America: Lagging Growth and High Poverty … Do We Care?Choices 4(Spring 1989):45.Google Scholar
Duncan, C.M.Persistent Poverty in Appalachia: Scare Work and Rigid Stratification.” Chapter 6 in Duncan, C.M. (editor), Rural Poverty in America. New York: Auburn House, 1992.Google Scholar
Hyland, S. and Timberlake, M.. “The Mississippi Delta: Change or Continued Trouble.” in Lyson, T.A. and Falk, W.W. (editors), Forgotten Places: Uneven Development in Rural America. (Lawrence): University Press of Kansas, 1993.Google Scholar
Isserman, A. and Rephann, T.. “The Economic Effects of the Appalachian Regional Commission.” Journal of the American Planning Association 61(Summer 1995):345364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janofsky, M.Pessimism Retains Grip on Appalachian Poor.” The New York Times, February 9, 1998, pp. Al, A13.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.L.Bulletin 965. Department of Information Services, Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine. Mississippi State University, 1989.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.L. and Billings, D.W.. “Appalachian Culture and Economic Development.” www.rri.wvv.edu/arc.htmGoogle Scholar
Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission. Body of the Nation. Memphis, 1989.Google Scholar
Morris, L.V, and Wimberley, R.C. “Dependence.” In Gorham, G.A. (editor), Encyclopedia of Rural America, Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 1997, pp. 185188.Google Scholar
Reinschmiedt, L. and Green, B.. Socioeconomic Conditions: The Mississippi Delta. Department of Information Services, Division of Agriculture, Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University.Google Scholar
Sherman, A.Poverty Matters: The Cost of Child Poverty. URL: www.childrensdefense.org/fairstart_provmat.html.Google Scholar
Swanson, L.E., Harris, R.P., Skees, J.R., and Williamson, L.. “African Americans in Southern Rural Regions: The Importance of Legacy.” Chapter 5 in Stewart, J. and Allen-Smith, J.E. (editors), Blacks in Rural America: New Brunswick, Transactions Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. and McDowell, D.R.. “Determinants of Poverty among Workers.” Chapter 8 in Stewart, J.B. and Allen-Smith, J.E., editors. Blacks in Rural America. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Income and Poverty 1998. URL: http://www.cens.gov/hhes/incomeGoogle Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives. Final Report of the Lower Mississippi Delta Development Commission, Joint Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Economic Development of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation and the Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization of the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, May 16, 1990. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1990.Google Scholar
Wimberley, R.C. and Morris, L.V.. The Reference Book on Regional Well-Being: U.S. Regions, the Black Belt, Appalachia. Mississippi State, Mississippi: Southern Rural Development Center, 1996.Google Scholar
Wimberley, R.C. and Morris, L.V.. The Southern Black Belt: A National Perspective. Lexington, Kentucky: TVA Rural Studies Press, 1997.Google Scholar