Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:37:36.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Agricultural Economics 1950–2000*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Extract

In the past 25 years, agricultural economists have made significant progress, but have experienced substantial turmoil and great anxiety. These years have been a period of great introspection during which we have asked: “What are the fundamental purposes of our profession?” During this quarter century, rural America's practical problems important to our profession have changed rapidly. This rate will likely quicken in the future. Increasingly, we and our institutions will be challenged to “keep up” and to adjust. How well we respond and serve society will depend greatly on (1) our ability to preceive and to anticipate important issues, and (2) the flexibility of ourselves, our discipline, institutions and funds to accommodate to continual and increasing change.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, February 3, 1975. Deputy Administrator, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. This paper draws freely on a continual exchange with colleagues in the Economic Research Service, other agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and throughout the profession.

References

[1] Baker, Gladys L. and Rasmussen, Wayne D.Economic Research in the Department of Agriculture.” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
[2] Bawden, D. Lee. “The Neglected Human Factor.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55: 879887, December 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bishop, C. E.The Urbanization of Rural America: Implications for Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Farm Economics. 49: 9991008, December 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Bonnen, James T.Some Observations on the Organizational Nature of a Great Technological Payoff.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 44: 12791294, December 1962.Google Scholar
[5] Bressler, R. G.Agricultural Economics in the Decade Ahead.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 47: 521528, August 1965.Google Scholar
[6] Brinegar, George K., Bachman, Kenneth L., and Southworth, Herman M.Reorientations in Research in Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Farm Economics. 41: 600619, August 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Emerson, Ralph Waldo. In oration given before Phi Beta Kappa at Cambridge, published in the American Scholar, August 1837.Google Scholar
[8] Fox, Karl A.An Approach of Deficiencies in Food Price Forecasting for 1973, and Recommendations for Improvement.” Unpublished paper dated November 29, 1973.Google Scholar
[9] Gray, Roger W.Agricultural Economics: An Orientation for the 1970's.” Food Research Institute Studies, 12: 169175, 2, 1973.Google Scholar
[10] Hathaway, Dale E.The Implications of Changes in the Economy for Work in Agricultural Economics.” Journal of Farm Economics. 44: 12411248, December 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Hightower, Jim. Hard Tomatoes. Hard Times. The Failure of the Land Grant College Complex. Agribusiness Accountability Project. Washington, D. C., 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Johnson, Glenn L.The Quest for Relevance in Agricultural Economics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 53: 728739, December 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Mueller, Willard F.An Economist Looks at the Next Fifty Years of the Profession.” Journal of Farm Economics. 42: 10071018, December 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Agriculture's Capacity to Produce.” Bureau of Agricultural Economics, AIB No. 88, June 1952.Google Scholar