Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:45:57.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial and Legislative Approaches to Tax Evasion and Avoidance in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

M. T. Abdulrazaq
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper attempts to look at tax evasion and avoidance and the approach of the Nigerian courts and legislature. The starting point is an incursion into the history of taxation, especially personal taxation in Nigeria. Attempts are also made to define and distinguish evasion and avoidance while at the same time possible reasons are explored for explaining why people react to evasion and avoidance.

Reasons are given for resorting to English judicial decisions in explaining various Nigerian circumstances and lessons learnt from them are noted. The attitude of the Nigerian courts and legislature to tax evasion and avoidance are illustrated and in conclusion suggestions are offered to remedy the various anomalies in the system which aid tax evasion and avoidance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of African Law , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Spring 1985 , pp. 59 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Abdulai, & Emiko, , Revenue Law Study Sheet No. 2 p. 1., Faculty of Law, University of Lagos, n.d.Google Scholar

2 Leader of the faithful moslems.

2 Leader of the faithful moslems.

3 Abdulai, & Emiko, , loc. cit.Google Scholar

4 Kings.

5 Orewa, G. O., Taxation in Western and Midwestern Nigeria, (2nd ed.), 1.Google Scholar

6 Kirk-Greene, A. H. M., (ed.), Lord Lugard, Political Memoranda, 1913–18, Revision of Instruction to Political Officers on subjects Chiefly, political and administrative, 3rd ed., 166, 173–174.Google Scholar

7 G. O., Orewa, ibid, 2.

8 King of the Itsekiris.

9 Abdulai, & Emiko, , loc. cit., 2.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., 3.

11 Final Report on the Royal Commission on the Taxation of Profits and Income, Cmd. 9474, (1955), chapter 32 at paragraph 1016.Google Scholar

12 Orewa, , op. cit., 46, 51.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 53.

14 Humes, S.: A Study of the Development and Administration of Local Government in Nigeria, 330–340.Google Scholar

15 Orewa, , op. cit., 57, 69.Google Scholar

16 Midwest Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs: Local Government Circular No. MW 7/1965 (Ref. S. 28/120).

17 The Legislature referred to is the Supreme Military Council which has been the highest law-making body since 31 12, 1983.Google Scholar

18 Guardian (Lagos) Law Report, 27 11, 1983, 2.Google Scholar

19 Section 137(1) Evidence Act (Nigeria).

20 (1932) 11 N.L.R. 6 at 7.Google Scholar

21 [1960] A.C. 376.Google Scholar

21a [1958] 3 F.S.C. 67.Google Scholar

22 (1964) 42. T.C. 24, 35.Google Scholar

23 Millet, P.J., (1982) L.Q.R. 210.Google Scholar

24 (1920) 14. Tax Cas. 754, 763–764.Google Scholar

25 Millet, loc. cit.

26 Pinson on Revenue Law. (14th ed), p. 652, paragraph, 36–39.Google Scholar

27 [1966] LL.R. pp. 195,202.Google Scholar

28 Coltness Iron Company v. Black (1881) 6. A.C. 315.Google Scholar

29 Rennet v. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1962] Ch. 329.Google Scholar

30 Adamson v. Attorney-General [1933] A.C. 257.Google Scholar

31 Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1921] I. K.B. 64.Google Scholar

32 Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Ayrshire Employers Mutual Insurance Association Ltd. [1946] 1 All E.R. 637.Google Scholar

33 Astor v. Perry [1935] A.C. 398.Google Scholar

34 Ormond Investment Company v. Belts [1928] A.C. 143.Google Scholar

35 Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Duke of Westminster [1936] A.C. 1.Google Scholar

36 Ibid.

37 Millet, , op cit., 211.Google Scholar

38 [1979] S.T.C. 16, 21.Google Scholar

39 [1981] 2 W.L.R. 149. 453–456.Google Scholar

40 [1979] 1 W.L.R. 974, 979.Google Scholar

41 [1981] 2 W.L.R. 449, 457.Google Scholar

42 [1981] 2 W.L.R. 449, 459.Google Scholar

43 Ibid.

44 [1979] 2 All. E.R. 677, H.L.Google Scholar

45 [1981] 1 All. E.R 865. H.L.Google Scholar

46 See n. 38.

47 [1979] 3 All. E.R. 775, H.L.Google Scholar

48 [1982] S.T.C. 30.Google Scholar

49 Aberdeen Construction Group Ltd. v. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1948] A.C. 885.Google Scholar

50 Times Law Report. 24 12. 1981.Google Scholar

51 Times Law Report. 25 03. 1982.Google Scholar

52 [1958] A.C. 450. PC.Google Scholar

53 FCA/L/20/83 (unreported).

54 Section 260.

55 [1949] 1 All. E.R. 1108.Google Scholar

56 Levene v. Inland Revenue Commissioners [1982] A.C. 217per Viscount Summer.Google Scholar