Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:09:47.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutionality of the Death Penalty and Penal Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

John Hatchard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Notes
Information
Journal of African Law , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 192 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 [1994] 2 L.R.C. 335.Google Scholar

2 Unreported, 1995.

3 At 23 of cyclostyled judgment.

4 Unreported, 1995.

5 The other ten judges concurred but wrote separate judgments emphasizing different reasons for declaring the death penalty unconstitutional. These are noted below where appropriate.

6 Relying on Kindler v. Canada (1992) 6 C.R.R. (2d) 193 (Supreme Court of Canada) and Ng v. Canada United Nations Committee on Human Rights, Communication No. 469/1991, 5 November, 1993.

7 This was a view shared by Didcott, J.

8 Ackermann, J., also emphasized the issue of arbitrariness in the implementation and application of the death penalty which meant it was inconsistent with section 9, the right to life.

9 Didcott, Ackermann, Kreigler, Langa, Mahomed and O'Regan, JJ., all found the death sentence violated the right to life.

10 Mahomed, J., also emphasized that successful deterrence of serious crime also involved the need for substantial redress in socio-economic conditions in South Africa: see paras. 286–295.Google Scholar